Great if you want to have a go, Lewis! Agree we should document the release process.
https <https://commons.apache.org/releases/>:// <https://commons.apache.org/releases/>commons.apache.org <https://commons.apache.org/releases/>/releases/ <https://commons.apache.org/releases/> Should generally work, e.g. Try a mvn clean deploy of the snapshot first to see if you have Nexus permissions. mvn -Prelease release:prepare mvn -Prelease release:perform Make sure version number is 0.2.0-incubating Tag should include -RC1 Then you Close the repo in Nexus. After build, target should contain apache-commons-rdf-0.2.0-incubating.tar.gz/.zip and .asc .sha1 .md5: which you can push with svn to the dist.apache.org area dev/incubator/commonsrdf/ And then a VOTE email here with the checksums, commit id and URLs of dist and staging repo. I don't think you need to stage a website for this RC as our site and javadoc is already made from 0.2.0-SNAPSHOT. We have not used the commons build plugin to update download pages etc yet, (I'm not sure if it works outside the commons dist area) so those steps we can do manually. On 19 Apr 2016 5:09 a.m., "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Stian, > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:16 AM, < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <[email protected]> > > To: dev <[email protected]> > > Cc: > > Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 13:15:48 +0100 > > Subject: Re: Next Release for Commons RDF > > +1 > > > > If we can settle on Quad (pull request 19) - then we can include that > > as well which makes a nice release - otherwise let's just do a point > > release with the smaller improvements. > > > > I would be favorable to a point release 0.2? > > > > > > > > The parser API branch need a bit more work to settle, so I would not > > want to delay a release for that. > > > > Agreed. > > > > > > > > I can be RM unless you want to have a go, Lewis? > > > > Is the process documented anywhere? If not then it would be good to capture > it this time around. I have no objection to being a RM, however if you made > the 0.1 release and are able to document how 0.2 should be done then I > would prefer that. > Thanks > Lewis > > > > > > > > On 15 April 2016 at 05:43, Lewis John Mcgibbney > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > > I've seen quite a bit of activity recently which is nice. > > > Is there any appetite for a release? > > > Thanks > > > Lewis > > > > > > -- > > > *Lewis* > > > > > > > > -- > > Stian Soiland-Reyes > > Apache Taverna (incubating), Apache Commons RDF (incubating) > > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 > > > > > > > > > -- > *Lewis* >
