I see a lot of people who come from other communities (specifically CNCF) who are more familiar with the term "maintainer"[1] and are looking to map their existing understanding to our titles and roles. The actual responsibilities don't line up that cleanly for the committer/PMC titles on our side compared to the reviewer/member/maintainer on their side but notionally the idea that "maintainer == PMC member" carries some weight.
[1]: https://github.com/cncf/project-template/blob/main/CONTRIBUTOR_LADDER.md#maintainer On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 7:38 AM tison <wander4...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Could you do this thread belongs apache Tomcat > > While if a project would alias themselves, there should not be a blocker > also? > > Best, > tison. > > > tison <wander4...@gmail.com>于2024年3月24日 周日20:36写道： > > > > There is nothing to solve here. > > > > I like this idea. Thanks for sharing this option. > > > > Best, > > tison. > > > > > > Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com>于2024年3月24日 周日20:26写道： > > > >> As much as folks love to debate names ... this isn't a real problem. > Some > >> l > >> People call PMC members simply "PMC" and while this might grate on some > >> people, it's not a real problem. It does not actually cause any bad > >> outcomes other than the annoyance of a few people. > >> > >> There is nothing to solve here. > >> > >> Creating a new name will simply add yet more confusion and something > else > >> to get wrong. > >> > > >
