Contents about 3.0 looks awsome but Minor thing the content its swap, it will mess up the permalinks
The contents of 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md goes in 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md The contents of 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md goes in 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md --Carlos On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote: > Fuck, its here: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/ > > svn. I tell ya. > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > Pls review all: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI > > <anis.ka...@gmail.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser > >> <bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> > >>> The CLI treats the platform code as a build artifact. While this is > >>> the goal, the reality is that people modify the code, and people rely > >>> on old plugins. There will be users who NEVER use the CLI because of > >>> this fact, and will need to use plugman. Just because you want to > >>> have people use the software in a particular way doesn't mean that > >>> they will, and we should provide some support for people who want to > >>> not use the CLI. I don't use the CLI, because I actually work with > >>> the platform source on a regular basis and I don't want to constantly > >>> destroy and rebuild the project that I hooked the framework source to. > >>> > >>> I know that people will say that I'm a special case, but the bug > >>> tracker says otherwise. Also, we have CordovaWebView, which is a > >>> component that isn't even supported with the CLI flow. Just because > >>> the CLI is the new hawtness doesn't mean that we should neglect > >>> everyone who chooses to actually hack Cordova into something they > >>> want. > >>> > >> > >> +1 > -- Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>
