Working on it: CB-4360
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > thx breauxs > > methinks we book a little time to revisit this site. svn "uploading" > gigs of docs and junk is mega uncool. > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Thansk Andrew, I could never figure out the svn fiasco > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > > >> Better late than never. This is now live: > http://cordova.apache.org/#news > >> > >> Might need to hard-refresh the page to see the update. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > cool everyday I learn something new ! > >> > > >> > published > >> > > >> > Set to false if you don’t want a specific post to show up when the > site > >> is > >> > generated. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> > > >> > > You can also set a published bool in the front matter. [1] The svn > >> > > publish seems down and not getting an answer from infra . > >> > > > >> > > =( > >> > > > >> > > [1] http://jekyllrb.com/docs/frontmatter/ > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Carlos Santana < > csantan...@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > Cool I was just looking at the svn repo found the issues, but it > >> looks > >> > > like > >> > > > they are fix now > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > To avoid a post to go live just rename file with _ in front > >> > www/_posts/_ > >> > > > 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md > >> > > > > >> > > > When is ready to publish just remove '_' from the front and > rebuild > >> > site > >> > > > `rake build` > >> > > > and then svn commit > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> Good feedback: thx Ian and Carlos. Just pushed an update. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Ian Clelland < > iclell...@google.com > >> > > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > MIssed this earlier, but here goes: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> If you are working with a `cordova` generated project then you > >> can > >> > > >> install using it. (Plugman is included in the Cordova install.) > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I don't think this makes sense as a stand-alone paragraph -- I > had > >> > to > >> > > >> read > >> > > >> > it four times to figure out what the word "it" refers to. Maybe > >> > > something > >> > > >> > like > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > "If you are working with a `cordova`-generated project, then > you > >> can > >> > > >> > install plugins using the `cordova` tool as well. (`plugman` is > >> > > included > >> > > >> > with `cordova`, and is used by `cordova` internally to manage > >> > > plugins)" > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> You know we release regularily > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > "regularly" > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> - various native IDE's show generated files > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I don't know if this means much without mentioning the > difference > >> > > between > >> > > >> > the `www` directory and the `platforms` directories. Should > there > >> > be a > >> > > >> > paragraph earlier about editing the code in `www` and running > >> > prepare? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> - no way to upgrade existing CLI projects > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Maybe append "(this only affects you if you have been > beta-testing > >> > the > >> > > >> > `corvoda` tool with Cordova 2.9)" > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> - plugin discovery > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > What issue is this referring to? I think it could be worded > more > >> > > clearly, > >> > > >> > but I'm not sure what it is saying. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Maybe we just need to point to a "known issues" page, where we > can > >> > > detail > >> > > >> > all of these issues and the current workarounds. Or create JIRA > >> > issues > >> > > >> for > >> > > >> > them and link each bullet point to the appropriate bug. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Otherwise, it looks good! > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Ian > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Carlos Santana < > >> > > csantan...@gmail.com > >> > > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> Contents about 3.0 looks awsome but Minor thing the content > its > >> > > swap, it > >> > > >> >> will mess up the permalinks > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> The contents of 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md goes in > >> > > >> >> 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md > >> > > >> >> The contents of 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md goes in > >> > > >> >> 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> --Carlos > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > Fuck, its here: > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/ > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > svn. I tell ya. > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io > >> > > >> <javascript:;>> > >> > > >> >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> > > Pls review all: > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI < > >> > > anis.ka...@gmail.com > >> > > >> >> <javascript:;>> > >> > > >> >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser < > >> > bows...@gmail.com > >> > > >> >> <javascript:;>> > >> > > >> >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >>> The CLI treats the platform code as a build artifact. > >> While > >> > > this > >> > > >> is > >> > > >> >> > >>> the goal, the reality is that people modify the code, > and > >> > > people > >> > > >> rely > >> > > >> >> > >>> on old plugins. There will be users who NEVER use the > CLI > >> > > because > >> > > >> of > >> > > >> >> > >>> this fact, and will need to use plugman. Just because > you > >> > > want to > >> > > >> >> > >>> have people use the software in a particular way doesn't > >> mean > >> > > that > >> > > >> >> > >>> they will, and we should provide some support for people > >> who > >> > > want > >> > > >> to > >> > > >> >> > >>> not use the CLI. I don't use the CLI, because I > actually > >> > work > >> > > >> with > >> > > >> >> > >>> the platform source on a regular basis and I don't want > to > >> > > >> constantly > >> > > >> >> > >>> destroy and rebuild the project that I hooked the > framework > >> > > source > >> > > >> >> to. > >> > > >> >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > >>> I know that people will say that I'm a special case, but > >> the > >> > > bug > >> > > >> >> > >>> tracker says otherwise. Also, we have CordovaWebView, > >> which > >> > > is a > >> > > >> >> > >>> component that isn't even supported with the CLI flow. > >> Just > >> > > >> because > >> > > >> >> > >>> the CLI is the new hawtness doesn't mean that we should > >> > neglect > >> > > >> >> > >>> everyone who chooses to actually hack Cordova into > >> something > >> > > they > >> > > >> >> > >>> want. > >> > > >> >> > >>> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> +1 > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> -- > >> > > >> >> Carlos Santana > >> > > >> >> <csantan...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Carlos Santana > >> > > > <csantan...@gmail.com> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Carlos Santana > >> > <csantan...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Santana > > <csantan...@gmail.com> >
