You can also set a published bool in the front matter. [1] The svn publish seems down and not getting an answer from infra .
=( [1] http://jekyllrb.com/docs/frontmatter/ On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cool I was just looking at the svn repo found the issues, but it looks like > they are fix now > > > To avoid a post to go live just rename file with _ in front www/_posts/_ > 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md > > When is ready to publish just remove '_' from the front and rebuild site > `rake build` > and then svn commit > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> Good feedback: thx Ian and Carlos. Just pushed an update. >> >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@google.com> >> wrote: >> > MIssed this earlier, but here goes: >> > >> >> If you are working with a `cordova` generated project then you can >> install using it. (Plugman is included in the Cordova install.) >> > >> > I don't think this makes sense as a stand-alone paragraph -- I had to >> read >> > it four times to figure out what the word "it" refers to. Maybe something >> > like >> > >> > "If you are working with a `cordova`-generated project, then you can >> > install plugins using the `cordova` tool as well. (`plugman` is included >> > with `cordova`, and is used by `cordova` internally to manage plugins)" >> > >> >> You know we release regularily >> > >> > "regularly" >> > >> >> - various native IDE's show generated files >> > >> > I don't know if this means much without mentioning the difference between >> > the `www` directory and the `platforms` directories. Should there be a >> > paragraph earlier about editing the code in `www` and running prepare? >> > >> >> - no way to upgrade existing CLI projects >> > >> > Maybe append "(this only affects you if you have been beta-testing the >> > `corvoda` tool with Cordova 2.9)" >> > >> > >> >> - plugin discovery >> > >> > What issue is this referring to? I think it could be worded more clearly, >> > but I'm not sure what it is saying. >> > >> > Maybe we just need to point to a "known issues" page, where we can detail >> > all of these issues and the current workarounds. Or create JIRA issues >> for >> > them and link each bullet point to the appropriate bug. >> > >> > Otherwise, it looks good! >> > >> > Ian >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Contents about 3.0 looks awsome but Minor thing the content its swap, it >> >> will mess up the permalinks >> >> >> >> The contents of 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md goes in >> >> 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md >> >> The contents of 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md goes in >> >> 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md >> >> >> >> --Carlos >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> >> >> >> > Fuck, its here: >> >> > >> >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/ >> >> > >> >> > svn. I tell ya. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io >> <javascript:;>> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > Pls review all: >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com >> >> <javascript:;>> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com >> >> <javascript:;>> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> > >>> The CLI treats the platform code as a build artifact. While this >> is >> >> > >>> the goal, the reality is that people modify the code, and people >> rely >> >> > >>> on old plugins. There will be users who NEVER use the CLI because >> of >> >> > >>> this fact, and will need to use plugman. Just because you want to >> >> > >>> have people use the software in a particular way doesn't mean that >> >> > >>> they will, and we should provide some support for people who want >> to >> >> > >>> not use the CLI. I don't use the CLI, because I actually work >> with >> >> > >>> the platform source on a regular basis and I don't want to >> constantly >> >> > >>> destroy and rebuild the project that I hooked the framework source >> >> to. >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> I know that people will say that I'm a special case, but the bug >> >> > >>> tracker says otherwise. Also, we have CordovaWebView, which is a >> >> > >>> component that isn't even supported with the CLI flow. Just >> because >> >> > >>> the CLI is the new hawtness doesn't mean that we should neglect >> >> > >>> everyone who chooses to actually hack Cordova into something they >> >> > >>> want. >> >> > >>> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> +1 >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Carlos Santana >> >> <csantan...@gmail.com> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Carlos Santana > <csantan...@gmail.com>
