thx breauxs methinks we book a little time to revisit this site. svn "uploading" gigs of docs and junk is mega uncool.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thansk Andrew, I could never figure out the svn fiasco > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Better late than never. This is now live: http://cordova.apache.org/#news >> >> Might need to hard-refresh the page to see the update. >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> > cool everyday I learn something new ! >> > >> > published >> > >> > Set to false if you don’t want a specific post to show up when the site >> is >> > generated. >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >> > > You can also set a published bool in the front matter. [1] The svn >> > > publish seems down and not getting an answer from infra . >> > > >> > > =( >> > > >> > > [1] http://jekyllrb.com/docs/frontmatter/ >> > > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > Cool I was just looking at the svn repo found the issues, but it >> looks >> > > like >> > > > they are fix now >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > To avoid a post to go live just rename file with _ in front >> > www/_posts/_ >> > > > 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md >> > > > >> > > > When is ready to publish just remove '_' from the front and rebuild >> > site >> > > > `rake build` >> > > > and then svn commit >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Good feedback: thx Ian and Carlos. Just pushed an update. >> > > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@google.com >> > >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> > MIssed this earlier, but here goes: >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> If you are working with a `cordova` generated project then you >> can >> > > >> install using it. (Plugman is included in the Cordova install.) >> > > >> > >> > > >> > I don't think this makes sense as a stand-alone paragraph -- I had >> > to >> > > >> read >> > > >> > it four times to figure out what the word "it" refers to. Maybe >> > > something >> > > >> > like >> > > >> > >> > > >> > "If you are working with a `cordova`-generated project, then you >> can >> > > >> > install plugins using the `cordova` tool as well. (`plugman` is >> > > included >> > > >> > with `cordova`, and is used by `cordova` internally to manage >> > > plugins)" >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> You know we release regularily >> > > >> > >> > > >> > "regularly" >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> - various native IDE's show generated files >> > > >> > >> > > >> > I don't know if this means much without mentioning the difference >> > > between >> > > >> > the `www` directory and the `platforms` directories. Should there >> > be a >> > > >> > paragraph earlier about editing the code in `www` and running >> > prepare? >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> - no way to upgrade existing CLI projects >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Maybe append "(this only affects you if you have been beta-testing >> > the >> > > >> > `corvoda` tool with Cordova 2.9)" >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> - plugin discovery >> > > >> > >> > > >> > What issue is this referring to? I think it could be worded more >> > > clearly, >> > > >> > but I'm not sure what it is saying. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Maybe we just need to point to a "known issues" page, where we can >> > > detail >> > > >> > all of these issues and the current workarounds. Or create JIRA >> > issues >> > > >> for >> > > >> > them and link each bullet point to the appropriate bug. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Otherwise, it looks good! >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Ian >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Carlos Santana < >> > > csantan...@gmail.com >> > > >> >wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> Contents about 3.0 looks awsome but Minor thing the content its >> > > swap, it >> > > >> >> will mess up the permalinks >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> The contents of 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md goes in >> > > >> >> 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md >> > > >> >> The contents of 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md goes in >> > > >> >> 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> --Carlos >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote: >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > Fuck, its here: >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/ >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > svn. I tell ya. >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io >> > > >> <javascript:;>> >> > > >> >> > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > Pls review all: >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI < >> > > anis.ka...@gmail.com >> > > >> >> <javascript:;>> >> > > >> >> > wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser < >> > bows...@gmail.com >> > > >> >> <javascript:;>> >> > > >> >> > wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >>> The CLI treats the platform code as a build artifact. >> While >> > > this >> > > >> is >> > > >> >> > >>> the goal, the reality is that people modify the code, and >> > > people >> > > >> rely >> > > >> >> > >>> on old plugins. There will be users who NEVER use the CLI >> > > because >> > > >> of >> > > >> >> > >>> this fact, and will need to use plugman. Just because you >> > > want to >> > > >> >> > >>> have people use the software in a particular way doesn't >> mean >> > > that >> > > >> >> > >>> they will, and we should provide some support for people >> who >> > > want >> > > >> to >> > > >> >> > >>> not use the CLI. I don't use the CLI, because I actually >> > work >> > > >> with >> > > >> >> > >>> the platform source on a regular basis and I don't want to >> > > >> constantly >> > > >> >> > >>> destroy and rebuild the project that I hooked the framework >> > > source >> > > >> >> to. >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> >> > >>> I know that people will say that I'm a special case, but >> the >> > > bug >> > > >> >> > >>> tracker says otherwise. Also, we have CordovaWebView, >> which >> > > is a >> > > >> >> > >>> component that isn't even supported with the CLI flow. >> Just >> > > >> because >> > > >> >> > >>> the CLI is the new hawtness doesn't mean that we should >> > neglect >> > > >> >> > >>> everyone who chooses to actually hack Cordova into >> something >> > > they >> > > >> >> > >>> want. >> > > >> >> > >>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> +1 >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> -- >> > > >> >> Carlos Santana >> > > >> >> <csantan...@gmail.com> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Carlos Santana >> > > > <csantan...@gmail.com> >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Carlos Santana >> > <csantan...@gmail.com> >> > >> > > > > -- > Carlos Santana > <csantan...@gmail.com>