thx breauxs

methinks we book a little time to revisit this site. svn "uploading"
gigs of docs and junk is mega uncool.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thansk Andrew, I could never figure out the svn fiasco
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Better late than never. This is now live: http://cordova.apache.org/#news
>>
>> Might need to hard-refresh the page to see the update.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > cool everyday I learn something new !
>> >
>> > published
>> >
>> > Set to false if you don’t want a specific post to show up when the site
>> is
>> > generated.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> >
>> > > You can also set a published bool in the front matter. [1] The svn
>> > > publish seems down and not getting an answer from infra .
>> > >
>> > > =(
>> > >
>> > > [1] http://jekyllrb.com/docs/frontmatter/
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > Cool I was just looking at the svn repo found the issues, but it
>> looks
>> > > like
>> > > > they are fix now
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > To avoid a post to go live just rename file with _ in front
>> > www/_posts/_
>> > > > 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md
>> > > >
>> > > > When is ready to publish  just remove '_' from the front and rebuild
>> > site
>> > > > `rake build`
>> > > > and then svn commit
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Good feedback: thx Ian and Carlos. Just pushed an update.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Ian Clelland <iclell...@google.com
>> >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >> > MIssed this earlier, but here goes:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> If you are working with a `cordova` generated project then you
>> can
>> > > >> install using it. (Plugman is included in the Cordova install.)
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I don't think this makes sense as a stand-alone paragraph -- I had
>> > to
>> > > >> read
>> > > >> > it four times to figure out what the word "it" refers to. Maybe
>> > > something
>> > > >> > like
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > "If you are working with a `cordova`-generated project, then you
>> can
>> > > >> > install plugins using the `cordova` tool as well. (`plugman` is
>> > > included
>> > > >> > with `cordova`, and is used by `cordova` internally to manage
>> > > plugins)"
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> You know we release regularily
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > "regularly"
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> - various native IDE's show generated files
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > I don't know if this means much without mentioning the difference
>> > > between
>> > > >> > the `www` directory and the `platforms` directories. Should there
>> > be a
>> > > >> > paragraph earlier about editing the code in `www` and running
>> > prepare?
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> - no way to upgrade existing CLI projects
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Maybe append "(this only affects you if you have been beta-testing
>> > the
>> > > >> > `corvoda` tool with Cordova 2.9)"
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> - plugin discovery
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > What issue is this referring to? I think it could be worded more
>> > > clearly,
>> > > >> > but I'm not sure what it is saying.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Maybe we just need to point to a "known issues" page, where we can
>> > > detail
>> > > >> > all of these issues and the current workarounds. Or create JIRA
>> > issues
>> > > >> for
>> > > >> > them and link each bullet point to the appropriate bug.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Otherwise, it looks good!
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > Ian
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Carlos Santana <
>> > > csantan...@gmail.com
>> > > >> >wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> Contents about 3.0 looks awsome but Minor thing the content its
>> > > swap, it
>> > > >> >> will mess up the permalinks
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> The contents of 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md goes in
>> > > >> >> 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md
>> > > >> >> The contents of 2013-07-19-cordova-3.md goes in
>> > > >> >> 2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> --Carlos
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> On Thursday, July 18, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> > Fuck, its here:
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > svn. I tell ya.
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io
>> > > >> <javascript:;>>
>> > > >> >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >> > > Pls review all:
>> > > >> >> > >
>> > > >> >> > >
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cordova/site/www/_posts/2013-07-08-cordova-has-a-blog.md
>> > > >> >> > >
>> > > >> >> > >
>> > > >> >> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Anis KADRI <
>> > > anis.ka...@gmail.com
>> > > >> >> <javascript:;>>
>> > > >> >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Joe Bowser <
>> > bows...@gmail.com
>> > > >> >> <javascript:;>>
>> > > >> >> > wrote:
>> > > >> >> > >>
>> > > >> >> > >>> The CLI treats the platform code as a build artifact.
>>  While
>> > > this
>> > > >> is
>> > > >> >> > >>> the goal, the reality is that people modify the code, and
>> > > people
>> > > >> rely
>> > > >> >> > >>> on old plugins. There will be users who NEVER use the CLI
>> > > because
>> > > >> of
>> > > >> >> > >>> this fact, and will need to use plugman.  Just because you
>> > > want to
>> > > >> >> > >>> have people use the software in a particular way doesn't
>> mean
>> > > that
>> > > >> >> > >>> they will, and we should provide some support for people
>> who
>> > > want
>> > > >> to
>> > > >> >> > >>> not use the CLI.  I don't use the CLI, because I actually
>> > work
>> > > >> with
>> > > >> >> > >>> the platform source on a regular basis and I don't want to
>> > > >> constantly
>> > > >> >> > >>> destroy and rebuild the project that I hooked the framework
>> > > source
>> > > >> >> to.
>> > > >> >> > >>>
>> > > >> >> > >>> I know that people will say that I'm a special case, but
>> the
>> > > bug
>> > > >> >> > >>> tracker says otherwise.  Also, we have CordovaWebView,
>> which
>> > > is a
>> > > >> >> > >>> component that isn't even supported with the CLI flow.
>>  Just
>> > > >> because
>> > > >> >> > >>> the CLI is the new hawtness doesn't mean that we should
>> > neglect
>> > > >> >> > >>> everyone who chooses to actually hack Cordova into
>> something
>> > > they
>> > > >> >> > >>> want.
>> > > >> >> > >>>
>> > > >> >> > >>
>> > > >> >> > >> +1
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> --
>> > > >> >> Carlos Santana
>> > > >> >> <csantan...@gmail.com>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Carlos Santana
>> > > > <csantan...@gmail.com>
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Carlos Santana
>> > <csantan...@gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Santana
> <csantan...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to