Based on a previous github comment of yours , I was under the impression that the "-incubating" is only needed on the source tarball. I'm fine changing if that's the preferred way.
Does this naming convention also apply to the staged jars at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1000/? I suspect we'll have an rc2 based on a bug Mike just discovered right as I sent this email out. So we'll probably cancel this vote and make sure to have the artifact naming fixed in rc2. We would still be happy to have you look at the rc1 so that we can fix any other issues as part of rc2. Thanks, - Steve  https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/2#issuecomment-341086865 On 02/08/2018 11:43 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > I'll spend some time reviewing it, but right now my vote is a -1 due to the > package naming. > > Ideally, each package is "apache-daffodil-2.1.0-incubating" and this > package name should be used on all components. > > John > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:30 AM Steve Lawrence <slawre...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc1. >> >> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be >> found at: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/2.1.0-rc1/ >> >> Staging artifacts can be found at: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1000/ >> >> This release has been signed with PGP key 033AE661, corresponding to >> slawre...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file. >> This key can be found on keyservers, such as: >> >> http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x033AE661 >> >> It is also listed here: >> >> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/slawrence.asc >> >> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v2.1.0-rc1. >> >> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 2.1.0: >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-1864?jql=project%20%3D%20DAFFODIL%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.1.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC >> >> For a summary of the changes in this release, see: >> >> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/2.1.0/ >> >> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours >> (ends on Sunday, 11 February 2018, 12 Noon EST). >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> My vote: +1 >> >> Thanks, >> - Steve >> >