What about reusing javax.annotation.Priority?
2014-02-23 22:02 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: > it's just a stereotype to get a better tool-support... > @Advanced is also a qualifier (at least in codi). > > however, we need "ordinal" or we add @InvocationOrder as it was in codi. > once we do that, we break the consistency in that area. > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - > JavaEE Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2014-02-23 21:41 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com > >: > > > Another problem is that @web is a qualifier and @JsfPhaseListener is a > > stereotype and not a qualifier. > > > > So if we would change it, we must use different annotations. Right? > > > > IMO > > @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext context; > > would be great as it's just like a namespace. > > > > For the @JsfPhaseListener, something like @Advanced would be better. > > > > > > 2014-02-18 11:16 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com > > >: > > > > > IMO it's actually more expressive than any other names. Maybe > > > @DeltaSpikeManaged would be more impressive... > > > > > > +1 @DeltaSpike then, before keeping the old redudant/"ugly" qualifiers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-02-18 10:51 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > +1 kind of tradeoff > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> 2014-02-18 10:46 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek < > gerhard.petra...@gmail.com > > >: > > >> > we haven't seen a nice name so far -> i would keep what we have > right > > >> now > > >> > (it's redundant, but at least a bit more expressive). > > >> > > > >> > regards, > > >> > gerhard > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > 2014-02-18 10:20 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: > > >> > > > >> >> I do agree on @Managed not being very expressive. Think about the > > >> >> @ManagedBean disaster in JavaEE itself. 'Managed' is in the same > > >> ballpark > > >> >> like 'Class' or 'Object'. > > >> >> > > >> >> Managed by whom and what? > > >> >> In that case I'd rather go with @DeltaSpike or keep @Web... > > >> >> But I do not care that much about names... > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> LieGrue, > > >> >> strub > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Tuesday, 18 February 2014, 10:15, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> @Gerhard: yeah but managed is not expressive, doesnt give the > origin > > + > > >> >> >is quite standard for jmxso i would avoid it. That said it doesnt > > >> >> >bring any feature so i dont want to fight for a name. > > >> >> >Romain Manni-Bucau > > >> >> >Twitter: @rmannibucau > > >> >> >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > >> >> >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > >> >> >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> >2014-02-18 10:12 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek < > > >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: > > >> >> >> @romain: > > >> >> >> you will always have same/similar terms in different areas (see > > e.g. > > >> >> >> "message"). > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> regards, > > >> >> >> gerhard > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >
