I'd prefer something more explicit. Just changing the package would be enough for me Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-02-23 22:17 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>: > Hmm... > We could clone it for JEE6 support and handle both annotations for backward > compatibility. > Maybe we could also use it for other features (or later..) > > > 2014-02-23 22:14 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > >> That's would be ambiguous with JavaEE 6 >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2014-02-23 22:12 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com >> >: >> > What about reusing javax.annotation.Priority? >> > >> > >> > 2014-02-23 22:02 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com >> >: >> > >> >> it's just a stereotype to get a better tool-support... >> >> @Advanced is also a qualifier (at least in codi). >> >> >> >> however, we need "ordinal" or we add @InvocationOrder as it was in codi. >> >> once we do that, we break the consistency in that area. >> >> >> >> regards, >> >> gerhard >> >> >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> >> >> Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - >> >> JavaEE Consulting, Development and >> >> Courses in English and German >> >> >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-02-23 21:41 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko < >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com >> >> >: >> >> >> >> > Another problem is that @web is a qualifier and @JsfPhaseListener is a >> >> > stereotype and not a qualifier. >> >> > >> >> > So if we would change it, we must use different annotations. Right? >> >> > >> >> > IMO >> >> > @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext context; >> >> > would be great as it's just like a namespace. >> >> > >> >> > For the @JsfPhaseListener, something like @Advanced would be better. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > 2014-02-18 11:16 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko < >> >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com >> >> > >: >> >> > >> >> > > IMO it's actually more expressive than any other names. Maybe >> >> > > @DeltaSpikeManaged would be more impressive... >> >> > > >> >> > > +1 @DeltaSpike then, before keeping the old redudant/"ugly" >> qualifiers. >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > 2014-02-18 10:51 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> >> > > >> >> > > +1 kind of tradeoff >> >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >> > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >> > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >> > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> 2014-02-18 10:46 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek < >> >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com >> >> > >: >> >> > >> > we haven't seen a nice name so far -> i would keep what we have >> >> right >> >> > >> now >> >> > >> > (it's redundant, but at least a bit more expressive). >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > regards, >> >> > >> > gerhard >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > 2014-02-18 10:20 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>: >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> I do agree on @Managed not being very expressive. Think about >> the >> >> > >> >> @ManagedBean disaster in JavaEE itself. 'Managed' is in the same >> >> > >> ballpark >> >> > >> >> like 'Class' or 'Object'. >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> Managed by whom and what? >> >> > >> >> In that case I'd rather go with @DeltaSpike or keep @Web... >> >> > >> >> But I do not care that much about names... >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> LieGrue, >> >> > >> >> strub >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> On Tuesday, 18 February 2014, 10:15, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> >> > >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> @Gerhard: yeah but managed is not expressive, doesnt give the >> >> origin >> >> > + >> >> > >> >> >is quite standard for jmxso i would avoid it. That said it >> doesnt >> >> > >> >> >bring any feature so i dont want to fight for a name. >> >> > >> >> >Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> > >> >> >Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >> > >> >> >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >> > >> >> >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >> > >> >> >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >2014-02-18 10:12 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek < >> >> > >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>: >> >> > >> >> >> @romain: >> >> > >> >> >> you will always have same/similar terms in different areas >> (see >> >> > e.g. >> >> > >> >> >> "message"). >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> regards, >> >> > >> >> >> gerhard >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>
