Hmm...
We could clone it for JEE6 support and handle both annotations for backward
compatibility.
Maybe we could also use it for other features (or later..)


2014-02-23 22:14 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>:

> That's would be ambiguous with JavaEE 6
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
> 2014-02-23 22:12 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> >:
> > What about reusing javax.annotation.Priority?
> >
> >
> > 2014-02-23 22:02 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> >> it's just a stereotype to get a better tool-support...
> >> @Advanced is also a qualifier (at least in codi).
> >>
> >> however, we need "ordinal" or we add @InvocationOrder as it was in codi.
> >> once we do that, we break the consistency in that area.
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> gerhard
> >>
> >> http://www.irian.at
> >>
> >> Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
> >> JavaEE Consulting, Development and
> >> Courses in English and German
> >>
> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-02-23 21:41 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> >> >:
> >>
> >> > Another problem is that @web is a qualifier and @JsfPhaseListener is a
> >> > stereotype and not a qualifier.
> >> >
> >> > So if we would change it, we must use different annotations. Right?
> >> >
> >> > IMO
> >> > @Inject @DeltaSpike ServletContext context;
> >> > would be great as it's just like a namespace.
> >> >
> >> > For the @JsfPhaseListener, something like @Advanced would be better.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2014-02-18 11:16 GMT+01:00 Thomas Andraschko <
> >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> >> > >:
> >> >
> >> > > IMO it's actually more expressive than any other names. Maybe
> >> > > @DeltaSpikeManaged would be more impressive...
> >> > >
> >> > > +1 @DeltaSpike then, before keeping the old redudant/"ugly"
> qualifiers.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > 2014-02-18 10:51 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> >> > >
> >> > > +1 kind of tradeoff
> >> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >> 2014-02-18 10:46 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <
> >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
> >> > >:
> >> > >> > we haven't seen a nice name so far -> i would keep what we have
> >> right
> >> > >> now
> >> > >> > (it's redundant, but at least a bit more expressive).
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > regards,
> >> > >> > gerhard
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > 2014-02-18 10:20 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >> I do agree on @Managed not being very expressive. Think about
> the
> >> > >> >> @ManagedBean disaster in JavaEE itself. 'Managed' is in the same
> >> > >> ballpark
> >> > >> >> like 'Class' or 'Object'.
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> Managed by whom and what?
> >> > >> >> In that case I'd rather go with @DeltaSpike or keep @Web...
> >> > >> >> But I do not care that much about names...
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> LieGrue,
> >> > >> >> strub
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> On Tuesday, 18 February 2014, 10:15, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> > >> >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> @Gerhard: yeah but managed is not expressive, doesnt give the
> >> origin
> >> > +
> >> > >> >> >is quite standard for jmxso i would avoid it. That said it
> doesnt
> >> > >> >> >bring any feature so i dont want to fight for a name.
> >> > >> >> >Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > >> >> >Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> > >> >> >Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> > >> >> >LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> > >> >> >Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> >2014-02-18 10:12 GMT+01:00 Gerhard Petracek <
> >> > >> gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>:
> >> > >> >> >> @romain:
> >> > >> >> >> you will always have same/similar terms in different areas
> (see
> >> > e.g.
> >> > >> >> >> "message").
> >> > >> >> >>
> >> > >> >> >> regards,
> >> > >> >> >> gerhard
> >> > >> >> >>
> >> > >> >> >>
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>

Reply via email to