Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb: > Hi guys, > > sorry to rehash the question... > > A while back, we took a decision regarding names for interface > implementation. We had several different names all over the code, like > XXXImpl, BasicXXX, DefaultXXX, ConcreteXXX, BaseXXX where XXX is the > interface name. I think we agreed on the "Default" prefix, as far as I > can remember and find on gmail. > > For ServerEntry, this will give : > > (interface) ServerEntry > (abstract class) AbstractServerEntry > (class implementation) DefaultServerEntry > > Is that ok for everybody ? >
+1 Felix > Thanks ! >
