I think we decided that 'I' stands for Idiot in code ...
PS : I don't maen I'm an Idiot ;)
Alex Karasulu wrote:
Felix,
These are all good points which for some reason this morning I could
not think about myself. Thanks for showing me again why I don't like
this I stuff.
Really though I don't like the "I" prefix because it reminds me of Mac
and the Mac Store which I hate because of all those moronic
metro-sexual sales snobs that think they know something ... :)
Thanks,
Alex
On Dec 15, 2007 11:16 AM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Alex Karasulu schrieb:
> Yeap sounds good and like what we discussed.
>
> On side note though what about the using the 'I' prefix for
interfaces?
> Like IFoo and IBar etc. I personally don't like it but many
projects
> seem to use it.
I don't like it either
- It could also mean Internal, Integration, I... (so you'll need
to document it and read documentation anyway)
- So it's just one more character (interpretable)
- Imaging what happens e.b. when you type I and hit CTRL-Space in
Eclipse :-(
I'm absolutely fine without 'I'
I haven't had a look a the code so maybe it's just a useless note,
but IMO it makes (if ever) more sense having
interface and implementation split into different modules for api
(interfaces) and implementation.
Just my 2 cents
Regards
Felix
>
> Not trying to rehash this but I just want your input again ...
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
> On Dec 15, 2007 9:31 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry to rehash the question...
>
> A while back, we took a decision regarding names for interface
> implementation. We had several different names all over the
code, like
> XXXImpl, BasicXXX, DefaultXXX, ConcreteXXX, BaseXXX where
XXX is the
> interface name. I think we agreed on the "Default" prefix,
as far as I
> can remember and find on gmail.
>
> For ServerEntry, this will give :
>
> (interface) ServerEntry
> (abstract class) AbstractServerEntry
> (class implementation) DefaultServerEntry
>
> Is that ok for everybody ?
>
> Thanks !
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com> < http://www.iktek.com>
> directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org>
<http://directory.apache.org>
>
>
>
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
