Yeap sounds good and like what we discussed. On side note though what about the using the 'I' prefix for interfaces? Like IFoo and IBar etc. I personally don't like it but many projects seem to use it.
Not trying to rehash this but I just want your input again ... Cheers, Alex On Dec 15, 2007 9:31 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > sorry to rehash the question... > > A while back, we took a decision regarding names for interface > implementation. We had several different names all over the code, like > XXXImpl, BasicXXX, DefaultXXX, ConcreteXXX, BaseXXX where XXX is the > interface name. I think we agreed on the "Default" prefix, as far as I > can remember and find on gmail. > > For ServerEntry, this will give : > > (interface) ServerEntry > (abstract class) AbstractServerEntry > (class implementation) DefaultServerEntry > > Is that ok for everybody ? > > Thanks ! > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
