Stefan Seelmann schrieb: > Hi, > > in Studio we currently use all kind of naming schema > - sometimes the "I" prefix for interfaces, I choosed it because it is > used in the Eclispe API > - sometimes the Default prefix for implementations > - sometimes the Impl suffix for classed > - ... > > I think we should also use a common naming schema and I would suggest to > use the server's naming schema: > >> > > (interface) ServerEntry >> > > (abstract class) AbstractServerEntry >> > > (class implementation) DefaultServerEntry > > We don't need to rename all interfaces and classes immediately, but if > we refactor one or create a new one we should follow this convention. > > WDYT?
Look @ http://cwiki.apache.org/DIRxDEV/coding-standards.html. The last changes are older than one year, but nevertheless it's still valid and above fits quite good. Only DefaultServerEntry should be named DefaultServerEntryImpl (I hope the lowercase i of impl is a typo). What is missing on the wiki page from my POV are some generic formatting rules about xml. Felix
