Felix, These are all good points which for some reason this morning I could not think about myself. Thanks for showing me again why I don't like this I stuff.
Really though I don't like the "I" prefix because it reminds me of Mac and the Mac Store which I hate because of all those moronic metro-sexual sales snobs that think they know something ... :) Thanks, Alex On Dec 15, 2007 11:16 AM, Felix Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alex Karasulu schrieb: > > Yeap sounds good and like what we discussed. > > > > On side note though what about the using the 'I' prefix for interfaces? > > Like IFoo and IBar etc. I personally don't like it but many projects > > seem to use it. > > I don't like it either > - It could also mean Internal, Integration, I... (so you'll need to > document it and read documentation anyway) > - So it's just one more character (interpretable) > - Imaging what happens e.b. when you type I and hit CTRL-Space in Eclipse > :-( > > I'm absolutely fine without 'I' > > I haven't had a look a the code so maybe it's just a useless note, but IMO > it makes (if ever) more sense having > interface and implementation split into different modules for api > (interfaces) and implementation. > > Just my 2 cents > > > Regards > Felix > > > > > Not trying to rehash this but I just want your input again ... > > > > Cheers, > > Alex > > > > On Dec 15, 2007 9:31 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > sorry to rehash the question... > > > > A while back, we took a decision regarding names for interface > > implementation. We had several different names all over the code, > like > > XXXImpl, BasicXXX, DefaultXXX, ConcreteXXX, BaseXXX where XXX is the > > interface name. I think we agreed on the "Default" prefix, as far as > I > > can remember and find on gmail. > > > > For ServerEntry, this will give : > > > > (interface) ServerEntry > > (abstract class) AbstractServerEntry > > (class implementation) DefaultServerEntry > > > > Is that ok for everybody ? > > > > Thanks ! > > > > -- > > -- > > cordialement, regards, > > Emmanuel Lécharny > > www.iktek.com <http://www.iktek.com> > > directory.apache.org <http://directory.apache.org> > > > > > > > >
