On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 at 17:05, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is awesome. Thank you. > thank you! > It did not, however, address the "paying for code" issue. > I see the two things as orthogonal issues. my proposal only means to address the issue of how to make sure we're getting the most out of any potential engagement with Outreachy. I am sorry I didn't make this clearer in my first email I think it's right that the financial side of things continues to be discussed elsewhere Did you and Gris discuss this? It has been discussed alot on this list, > there are some concrete ideas for addressing this concern. How are these > ideas going to be rolled into the proposal? > we did, with Sam and Daniel too. that resulted in the following email: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1daf8d767f6be8db825ec96b6902698ed68eec5815a1ac1958aa064f@%3Cfundraising.apache.org%3E this is beyond my experience, so I am hoping that Gris, Daniel, etc, can figure something out
