> On 27 Jun 2019, at 18:42, Sage Sharp <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:19 AM Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 27 Jun 2019, at 17:32, Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> .. snip threath / etc … >> >>> I'm not disagreeing with you or Sam. However, the ASF has a core tenet >> that we don't pay for code and funding outreachy directly will likely cross >> a threshold that we are doing so. >> >> And indirectly crosses that threshold too. ... >> So I am wondering - if Outreachy would like to do this — then great — And >> why not grab this with both hands and let Outreachy simply fund these >> mentors themselves ? Just like we do for other contributions. …. >> So our relation with Outreachy would be just like with every other >> volunteer in the ASF ecosystem — contribute. > > Outreachy requires that each community participating have sponsorship for > at least one intern. The ASF communities participating in Outreachy without > sponsorship from a company or the ASF is a no-go.
Ok - so Outreachy does not want to sponsor this itself. And Outreachy has not anyone within the many communities that desire that interns work on their code ? Or at least not to the extend that they fund these Interns directly (at the company or through outreachy, etc — as is normal). Dw
