On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 1:06 AM Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> What I am thinking is that a moderator should be able to use the > moderation guidelines alone to decide on the disposition of a message, and > not need to refer to another document (CoC) to do the work. This is > especially true if we eventually put tooling into place where we should > have the tooling option to reject CoC violations as well. I expect that we > (you) can summarize point 5 for our moderation tooling. > I've added it. Can you review please? I did not just summarize point 5, because I think that level of detail is appropriate. And egads, that list of items makes me mad just thinking about them so: trigger warning. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EDI/Draft+moderation+guidelines In one point though there's a minor problem in the document now: "revealing private information" is now listed twice with two different consequences (one suggesting reformulation and re-sending, one threatening escalation and more serious consequences). Any ideas on how we'd like to resolve that conflict? Best, Myrle
