Hi Daniel, *,

On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 07:27:40PM -0500, Daniel Carrera wrote:
> Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> 
> > > 2) Documentation is not a replacement for simplicity.
> > 
> > But how can the documentation be any simpler than it is now, explaining
> > and mentioning each single step?
> 
> You don't understand, documentation is no replacement for having a simple 
> process. It is better to have a simple process, than to have a complicated 
> process with documentation.

No objections. But when you cannot change the system you have to live
with it.

> > > I had trouble figuring out what the heck a tunnel is,
> > 
> > Do you really have to know what a tunnel is?
> 
> 1) The documentation made me feel like I did.
> 2) Documentation that refers to things the user doesn't understand is not 
> simple or friendly.
> 
> If I explain a process and I start referring to things you don't 
> understand, you will have a much harder time following. Worse yet, the 
> documentation is written in a way that presumes knowledge of these 
> concepts.

OK. That is something concrete to work with.
What is your suggestion on how to explain a "tunnel"?
 
> [...] 
> The documentation is also overwhelming, considering how little actually 
> information it actually has.

So what are your suggestions. (Plese be concrete, not just say "rewrite
it, make is more user-friendly")

> The documentation is very poorly organized, and key steps were missing or 
> very ambiguous.
> 
> > Are you talking about the same document?
> 
> Yes. I checked.
> 
> > what is ambiguous with the instruction 'enter "ssh-keygen -d"'
> 
> For one, the fact that it's under Cygwin and I don't have Cygwin. Why 
> should I look there?

OK, good point. Although the doc states "Cygwin, from Cygnus Solutions,
provides a nearly full Unix environment on your desktop"
 
This may be overlooked.
 
ciao
Christian
-- 
NP: Donots - We're Not Gonna Take It

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to