Ankit, your actions and / or the firm you represent show a consistent and lengthy pattern where you do not seem to understand how The Apache Software Foundation works.
No, We do not make blanket rules for one off problems. We are a meritocracy and build consensus with those who have earned merit. Your and your colleagues and actions are clearly not those of an individual but an organization with differing goals and objectives from this foundation which you continue to post about on our forums. I am formally stating my objection to your posts and actions. I am formally recommending you and your organization for moderation. Regards, KAM On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, 03:41 Muellners ApS <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey James, > Thanks for clarifying norms here: > > A. 1 & 2 is quite important. > Can I ask you or PMC (as you are the representative of PMC)... > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 06.24, James Dailey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> All - >> >> Apache Fineract operates under the rules established by the Apache >> Software Foundation. >> https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html >> https://community.apache.org/projectIndependence >> https://www.apache.org/foundation/governance/ >> see our stuff: >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103094318 >> >> 1. As a community of people, we are not here as our company or >> institution, we are independent persons (individuals). >> >> Individuals familiar with or employed by commercial Fineract based >> Solution Providers, are very welcome to discuss that solution here, >> especially IF it includes ways in which ideas, requirements, and code >> can be implemented and contributed back to the community. Apache is >> non-commercial. >> >> Similarly, solutions that connect to Fineract are welcome to help >> document and improve APIs, test scripts, and the like, to enable good >> system boundaries. >> >> 2. We abide by norms of good behavior and assume good intent. Positive >> discussion usually starts with identifying the contribution you - as >> an individual - want to make. >> >> It helps immensely to follow norms of a single topic in a threaded >> email conversation. I.e.Please do not respond to an email w a >> different topic. >> >> 3. We strive to have all our discussions on this public listserv. >> This may strike some as 'old fashioned' but it is there for good >> reasons. If you use outside tools (chats, gitter, slack, etc), those >> conversations should be brought back to list, or "they didn't happen". >> It's ok to share via tickets as well, but you get more mileage having >> a discussion. >> >> 4. The dev list is public and we allow all in. >> Over time, positive contributions by participants on list, in content >> for wiki, in tickets, and in code, earn recognition and merit >> consideration for additional responsibilities to and on behalf of the >> project. >> >> James Dailey >> On behalf of the Fineract PMC >> > >
