The Apache Fineract PMC disagrees and disavows the contents of this message. The PMC believes the email below to be based upon an unfounded and uninformed set of beliefs. We have no further reply to this matter.
James Dailey on behalf of the PMC On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 7:27 AM Muellners ApS <[email protected]> wrote: > Kevin! > It's sad that you use words like "lurking" and "free", ridiculing fellow > human beings with some sort of shortsightedness, and demonstrating a lack > of empathy. Must it be a self defeating conscious experience? > > *Let me try again to discard your assumptions,& speculations once again. I > have written in "Bold" what could be helpful to bring clarity.* > > *in the forthcoming messages:* > * "We" - it means that I am representing the word "WE" with this community > in the context to which a statement may be written.* > *"I" - is me but not only me. This is quite abstract. Is it not? "*I" is > clearly an individual contributor here just like you. > *"MF"- Muellners Foundation* > *"ASF" - Apache Software Foundation* > > You again speak without qualified data and your statements are nothing > substantial but presumptive. > 1. If you can operate at a detailed level of consciousness, then please > scan this list, and also the code repo of github.com/apachefineract and > see what & how MF is contributing PRs of features consistently for more > than a year now. Look for more information. I have been personally > observing and assisting this project's adoption, even before ASF incubated > this. So "years" of lurking(why would you even use such adjectives cmon, > such a shameful choice of words). ( ASSESS THE MERITS OF THE PROJECT > CONTRIBUTION BUT BE RESPECTFUL. THIS IS NOT YOUR BACKYARD.) > > Let me return some *free* advice: "Please share qualified data. PERIOD. > > 2. MF cannot speak for the entire community. Neither can I. It is an > outside organisation. These ASF rules don't bind MF members outside this > list. Community members shall speak with their own voices. (ESTABLISH > CLARITY OF ROLES OF STAKEHOLDERS HERE. ) > > 3. Thanks and once again, please respond with qualified information, or > else don't bother. What's the point otherwise? Nobody has time to > discuss gossip & hearsay. (RESPOND OR SHARE DATA POINTS CITING ANY > STATEMENT WITH ANY ADJECTIVE OR USE OF WORDS DEFINING SOMEONE ON THE LIST) > > Thanks > > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:57 PM Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, 08:46 Muellners ApS <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Kevin, thanks for emailing me. I would like to state "we" here always >>> mean community when I write these emails. >>> >> >> And that right there is the crux of the issue. >> >> You don't speak for the community. >> >> Your organization does not speak for the community. >> >> Neither have earned the merit to do so. >> >> My advice to you: Get a freemail address, spend a few *years* lurking on >> Apache lists to gain a better idea of how it works, work on small patches >> to code/documentation, start building merit, and post about your >> organization on its resources not ours. >> >> Regards, KAM >> > > > -- > Ankit > Managing Partner > Muellners ApS, Denmark > > Impressum- Muellners® Inc; Copenhagen, Denmark CVR: 41548304; > New Delhi, India CIN: U72900DL2019PTC344870; Foundation EU CVR:41008407 > > This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy. > The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents > may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from > disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if > this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert > the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any > attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents > of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly > prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be > monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure > compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails > are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be > intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed > to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail. >
