My bad for not voting clearly. If you two are confident that we can make a release of Swiz in a reasonable timeframe, I am cool with it.
It would bode well for us if we make a blog post making it clear that we support all other frameworks as well. Can someone come up with such a post and put it up for discussion here? Once we have consensus about the content of the blog post, we can publish it. And Erik, I do agree that this is not something that can be vetoed. Thanks, Om On Jun 1, 2013 10:34 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: > Sorry Om, > > your mail was confusing since it had -1 and +1 votes in the same mail, so > the external lecture was that it was only an opinion and want to express > something but not state a final vote. > > Regarding the "contrib" folder, I'm not a supporter of this idea in the > Swiz case, since in my case we already released three more minor versions > and would want to commit those updates here (to get 1.4.3 version). Then > I'd want to enter 2.0.0 beta donation and set the playground to start > discussing compile-time weaving and AOP. Just my 2 cnts in regarding this > concrete point. > > Best > > > > > 2013/6/1 OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > > > I am sorry, but I voted a -1 binding as well and my concerns have not > been > > addressed. > > > > If we are going to go ahead, can we at least bring it into a contrib > folder > > and make at least one release out of it before promoting it to a main > repo? > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > On Jun 1, 2013 10:07 AM, "Carlos Rovira" <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Ok Erik, > > > > > > I see it ok as well. As you said there's only one -1 binding vote (Igor > > > Costa) and one -1 non binding vote (Carlos Velasco), and it was already > > > explained the motivations behind the donation and the intention to > > maintain > > > swiz out of main flex-sdk cycle and not promote it as the preferred > > mvc-ioc > > > microarquitecture. > > > > > > So for me it's ok, if it's ok for the rest of people here. > > > > > > Hope Chris could send us that email soon regarding it's intention of > > donate > > > the source code and wiki > > > > > > Thanks to you Erik as well for clearing things here. > > > > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/6/1 Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> > > > > > > > I think this is a valid vote and there is no need to declare it > > > > invalid. There is only one definite, binding -1 (Igor) and he > declined > > > > to explain his motivation, something that is customary when casting a > > > > negative vote. > > > > > > > > Once Chris Scott 'officially' donates Swiz - there are some hoops he > > > > has to jump through, but we'll get to those when he contacts us- we > > > > can create a new repo for it: either a general 'flex-contrib/swiz' or > > > > a specific one, like 'flex-swiz', we need to discuss that a bit more, > > > > I think. > > > > > > > > Thank you Carlos for managing the vote and keeping track of this > > > donation. > > > > > > > > EdB > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > Director de Tecnología > > > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > > > F: +34 912 94 80 80 > > > http://www.codeoscopic.com > > > http://www.directwriter.es > > > http://www.avant2.es > > > > > > > > > -- > Carlos Rovira > Director de Tecnología > M: +34 607 22 60 05 > F: +34 912 94 80 80 > http://www.codeoscopic.com > http://www.directwriter.es > http://www.avant2.es >
