Dammit … I forgot to mention something else I managed to arrange ☺

Applications to TAC are opening in the next days. If your TAC application gets 
accepted the Apache Fondation will cover all the travel costs for staying the 
entire week including the Summit (Actually being able to stay the whole 
working-week is a requirement for getting your application accepted).

Now you may think that others might be more worthy of applying but I would like 
to convince you to apply if money is what’s keeping you from going. In the past 
few times I have been acting as a Judge and part of the organization of TAC we 
have had several TACers that turned out being happy to attend a free holiday, 
so if we get people really wanting to get involved in Apache and Apache 
Projects, this is what TAC is really made for. 

@Piotr you have been really active in the past and it would be a shame to not 
have you there. So please reconsider. 

I would love to meet all of you guys I only know email addresses of.

Chris


Am 24.01.17, 09:59 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>:

    Hello Chris,
    
    I have no budget to visit US :(
    Will try to attend ApacheCon EU :)
    
    On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Christofer Dutz
    <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
    > Ok so I managed to come up with a proposal for a Flex Summit prior to 
ApacheCon this year in Miami:
    >
    > We could have an official Flex Project Summit on Monday prior to 
ApacheCon at the ApacheCon venue. However financially this would be a separate 
thing.
    > At a Price of 125$/Person we would be provided with a location which is 
fully equipped and capable of hosting 40 People (Including projector, wifi, 
audio-recording, power-plugs, …).
    >
    > A financial break-even for the Linux Foundation would be at 30 
registrations. If we manage to get above that number, the LF would add some 
food goodies to the coffee break. If we are below the 30 they could reduce the 
costs by removing Mic and Recording. I guess that’s a really fair deal. What do 
you think?
    >
    > If we agree and see a chance of having somewhere around the 30 Attendees, 
I could give the girls the go and they would setup a registration-form for the 
event. We would be added to the “Co-Located events” Page of the ApacheCon and 
get two dedicated Flex Summit Signs on Site (Yay … wouldn’t have done it 
without those signs ☺ )
    >
    > So now we need to check how many people would really register for such a 
thing. I don’t want to have the girls do the preparation work for just 10 
People attending.
    >
    > So guys … please don’t stay quiet … I would be happy to get some “+1”, 
“-1” or “0” … or “+10000” to see where we’re going. So all of you who sort of 
switched to monitoring mode on this list … please speak up. If it’s only the 
usual 1 x -1 and 3 x +1 there’s no use in me investing more time into this.
    >
    > Chris
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Am 19.01.17, 16:13 schrieb "omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash 
Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von bigosma...@gmail.com>:
    >
    >     On Jan 19, 2017 3:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
    >     wrote:
    >
    >     Yeah … well I would still like some other opinions.
    >
    >     Thing is, that the ApacheCon was intentionally changed to having Core 
and
    >     BigData in parallel to make room for a Project Summit Day prior to the
    >     conference.
    >     So I’m proposing to do exactly this.
    >
    >     The good thing of us having a Project Summit as part of the Apache Con
    >     would be that the Linux Foundation takes care of organizing, the 
logistics,
    >     the Tickets and so on. And people wanting to attend, but not being 
able to
    >     afford it, can apply for Apache Travel Assistance. In the best case 
the ASF
    >     would pay for flights, hotel and conference. I contacted Angela (the 
one
    >     from the Linux Foundation who organizes the conference) and asked her 
if it
    >     is possible to buy just a Project Summit ticket. Hopefully she will 
confirm
    >     that this is possible. In that case I don’t see a reason for us not 
taking
    >     the opportunity. Especially as eventually there might not be a 
European
    >     ApacheCon this year.
    >
    >     So again … what do you guys think?
    >
    >
    >     +1 for sure.  Thanks for working on this!
    >
    >     Regards,
    >     Om
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >     Chris
    >
    >
    >
    >     Am 18.01.17, 17:25 schrieb "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com>:
    >
    >
    >
    >         On 1/18/17, 3:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
    >     wrote:
    >
    >         >I just remembered that I wanted to reply to this one …
    >         >
    >         >Well the thing is, that I won’t be able to convince my company 
to have
    >     me
    >         >fly to the US just for a FlexJS event with about 10-30 attendees.
    >         >
    >         >Would it be an option, if there was a FlexJS Day before the 
conference,
    >         >but attendees wouldn’t have to buy a ticket for the entire 
conference,
    >         >but could only come (and eventually pay) for the FlexJS event?
    >         >This way I could justify the costs with my boss … speaking at the
    >     FlexJS
    >         >event and the Conference would definitely be enough for them.
    >
    >         ApacheCon has a rule about "no other conferences within 3 weeks 
before
    >     or
    >         after ApacheCon".  Naturally, they want sponsors to put money into
    >         ApacheCon and attendees to buy tickets.  Anything that looks like 
it
    >         undercuts that would be denied.  It might be possible to convince
    >         ApacheCon that our little 10-30 person get-together does not harm 
their
    >         business.  Not sure.
    >
    >         FWIW, at the last (and only, so far) FlexJS World Tour, we only 
had
    >     about
    >         10 non-committers show up.  Many more attended on-line.  So maybe 
the
    >     next
    >         get-together should just be on-line.
    >
    >         Thoughts?
    >         -Alex
    >
    >
    
    
    
    -- 
    WBR
    Maxim aka solomax
    

Reply via email to