I really scared of the fact there will be no ApacheCon EU this year :(
I have my wedding on May 25 this year, and already have scheduled trip
to Prague on May 26 ....

I'm afraid bachelor's party on May 16-20 in Miami will be too much :)))))
Maybe I can see you in Prague? Unofficial Flex Meetup :)))

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Christofer Dutz
<christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> As I said Maxim … I am not sure there will be one this year.
> And think of applying for TAC … you remember it’s a lot of fun too ;-)
>
> Chris
>
> Am 24.01.17, 09:59 schrieb "Maxim Solodovnik" <solomax...@gmail.com>:
>
>     Hello Chris,
>
>     I have no budget to visit US :(
>     Will try to attend ApacheCon EU :)
>
>     On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Christofer Dutz
>     <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
>     > Ok so I managed to come up with a proposal for a Flex Summit prior to 
> ApacheCon this year in Miami:
>     >
>     > We could have an official Flex Project Summit on Monday prior to 
> ApacheCon at the ApacheCon venue. However financially this would be a 
> separate thing.
>     > At a Price of 125$/Person we would be provided with a location which is 
> fully equipped and capable of hosting 40 People (Including projector, wifi, 
> audio-recording, power-plugs, …).
>     >
>     > A financial break-even for the Linux Foundation would be at 30 
> registrations. If we manage to get above that number, the LF would add some 
> food goodies to the coffee break. If we are below the 30 they could reduce 
> the costs by removing Mic and Recording. I guess that’s a really fair deal. 
> What do you think?
>     >
>     > If we agree and see a chance of having somewhere around the 30 
> Attendees, I could give the girls the go and they would setup a 
> registration-form for the event. We would be added to the “Co-Located events” 
> Page of the ApacheCon and get two dedicated Flex Summit Signs on Site (Yay … 
> wouldn’t have done it without those signs ☺ )
>     >
>     > So now we need to check how many people would really register for such 
> a thing. I don’t want to have the girls do the preparation work for just 10 
> People attending.
>     >
>     > So guys … please don’t stay quiet … I would be happy to get some “+1”, 
> “-1” or “0” … or “+10000” to see where we’re going. So all of you who sort of 
> switched to monitoring mode on this list … please speak up. If it’s only the 
> usual 1 x -1 and 3 x +1 there’s no use in me investing more time into this.
>     >
>     > Chris
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Am 19.01.17, 16:13 schrieb "omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von OmPrakash 
> Muppirala" <omup...@gmail.com im Auftrag von bigosma...@gmail.com>:
>     >
>     >     On Jan 19, 2017 3:42 AM, "Christofer Dutz" 
> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
>     >     wrote:
>     >
>     >     Yeah … well I would still like some other opinions.
>     >
>     >     Thing is, that the ApacheCon was intentionally changed to having 
> Core and
>     >     BigData in parallel to make room for a Project Summit Day prior to 
> the
>     >     conference.
>     >     So I’m proposing to do exactly this.
>     >
>     >     The good thing of us having a Project Summit as part of the Apache 
> Con
>     >     would be that the Linux Foundation takes care of organizing, the 
> logistics,
>     >     the Tickets and so on. And people wanting to attend, but not being 
> able to
>     >     afford it, can apply for Apache Travel Assistance. In the best case 
> the ASF
>     >     would pay for flights, hotel and conference. I contacted Angela 
> (the one
>     >     from the Linux Foundation who organizes the conference) and asked 
> her if it
>     >     is possible to buy just a Project Summit ticket. Hopefully she will 
> confirm
>     >     that this is possible. In that case I don’t see a reason for us not 
> taking
>     >     the opportunity. Especially as eventually there might not be a 
> European
>     >     ApacheCon this year.
>     >
>     >     So again … what do you guys think?
>     >
>     >
>     >     +1 for sure.  Thanks for working on this!
>     >
>     >     Regards,
>     >     Om
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Chris
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     Am 18.01.17, 17:25 schrieb "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com>:
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >         On 1/18/17, 3:52 AM, "Christofer Dutz" 
> <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
>     >     wrote:
>     >
>     >         >I just remembered that I wanted to reply to this one …
>     >         >
>     >         >Well the thing is, that I won’t be able to convince my company 
> to have
>     >     me
>     >         >fly to the US just for a FlexJS event with about 10-30 
> attendees.
>     >         >
>     >         >Would it be an option, if there was a FlexJS Day before the 
> conference,
>     >         >but attendees wouldn’t have to buy a ticket for the entire 
> conference,
>     >         >but could only come (and eventually pay) for the FlexJS event?
>     >         >This way I could justify the costs with my boss … speaking at 
> the
>     >     FlexJS
>     >         >event and the Conference would definitely be enough for them.
>     >
>     >         ApacheCon has a rule about "no other conferences within 3 weeks 
> before
>     >     or
>     >         after ApacheCon".  Naturally, they want sponsors to put money 
> into
>     >         ApacheCon and attendees to buy tickets.  Anything that looks 
> like it
>     >         undercuts that would be denied.  It might be possible to 
> convince
>     >         ApacheCon that our little 10-30 person get-together does not 
> harm their
>     >         business.  Not sure.
>     >
>     >         FWIW, at the last (and only, so far) FlexJS World Tour, we only 
> had
>     >     about
>     >         10 non-committers show up.  Many more attended on-line.  So 
> maybe the
>     >     next
>     >         get-together should just be on-line.
>     >
>     >         Thoughts?
>     >         -Alex
>     >
>     >
>
>
>
>     --
>     WBR
>     Maxim aka solomax
>
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to