+1 to calling the interactive shell "geode" On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Vincent Ford <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 to calling the interactive shell "geode" > > *Vince Ford* > GemFire Sustenance Engineering > Beaverton, OR USA > 503-533-3726 (office) > http://www.pivotal.io > Open Source Project Geode > https://network.pivotal.io/products/project-geode > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Rajesh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Bruce Schuchardt < > [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit : > > > > > >> Here's my $0.02: > > >> > > >> I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire. > > >> > > >> > > >> - At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment > > >> management scripts > > >> - It's important for users to not cross the streams - - > > explicit = > > >> good > > >> - Managing gfsh vs. gsh in existing scripts is error prone. > (think > > >> about troubleshooting classpath for gfsh vs gsh) > > >> - We have 50+ developers with gfsh on a PC classpath. We don't > want > > >> to > > >> teach them gsh vs. gfsh > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Brian - > > >> > > >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, pulkit chandra < > > >> [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> +1 Gsh. > > >>> > > >>> If called GoSH I won't mind that either :) . > > >>> > > >>> Best Regards, > > >>> *Pulkit Chandra* > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Namrata Thanvi <[email protected] > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +1 for gsh > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards, > > >>>> Namrata > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < > > [email protected] > > >>>> > > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Tushar Khairnar > > >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> +1 for gsh > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> +1 to gsh (although I do reserve the right to pronounce it as GoSH > > ;-)) > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks, > > >>>>> Roman. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > > > >
