Jarek, I don't think I'm going to have any more time to add javadocs or anything. Thus, it's current state is probably the best that will be there for a while. Could you go ahead and move it back to G and do whatever updates are needed for a "alpha" release?
Major thanks! Dan On Mon June 15 2009 10:40:43 am Jarek Gawor wrote: > Dan, > > Let me know when you think you are done with it and I'll move it to > Geronimo. > > Thanks for working on this, btw. > > Jarek > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Kulp<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri June 12 2009 5:23:42 pm David Jencks wrote: > >> What would your thought be on moving it to the geronimo spec project > >> once it isn't having daily changes? > > > > Actually, with Dims' help, we're now there. I ran the tool Harmony used > > to compare API's and we're now 100% compatible with the jaxws 2.2 api > > jar. Now, that is not the same as running the TCK (which we don't have > > yet), but definitely a promising sign. I think I want to spend a > > little time early next week adding some javadoc, but then it would be > > good to move it back to geronimo-specs and do an "alpha" release. > > (wouldn't call it a 1.0 release until we have a tck to test it). > > > > Dan > > > >> I'm planning to release the jaxb 2.1 spec jar soon for geronimo 2.2. > >> > >> thanks > >> david jencks > >> > >> On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> > On Fri June 12 2009 3:42:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> >> Thanks Dan, we need it for axis2 as well. Looks like we need 2.2 of > >> >> JAXB as > >> >> well. > >> > > >> > I'm slightly less concerned about JAXB for right now for three > >> > reasons: > >> > > >> > 1) It's available in the Sun maven repos already (and now > >> > central ;-) ) > >> > > >> > 2) We never have had a JAXB 2.1 version released yet. We've always > >> > used the > >> > Sun version anyway. > >> > > >> > 3) We don't have an Apache implementation of JAXB so we need the Sun > >> > implementation anyway. > >> > > >> > Yes, a JAXB 2.2 version would be nice, but not critical right now. > >> > JAX-WS > >> > 2.2 is slightly critical as there isn't a version deployed in maven > >> > that we > >> > can start using as a starting point. We need SOMETHING that we can > >> > use > >> > pretty much ASAP. > >> > > >> > Dan > >> > > >> >> -- dims > >> >> > >> >> On 06/12/2009 03:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >>> Just to let everyone know, I've started working on creating a > >> >>> specs jar > >> >>> for jaxws 2.2 in the CXF sandbox: > >> >>> > >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/ > >> >>> > >> >>> All apache committers can commit there so if anyone wants to help > >> >>> out... > >> >>> ;-) > >> >>> > >> >>> Mostly just wanted to let folks know I've started it so someone else > >> >>> doesn't go off and start it as well. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Daniel Kulp > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > [email protected] > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
