On Tue June 16 2009 12:21:08 pm David Jencks wrote: > I bundlized it. I had kind of removed it as there really isn't a way for it to work as a bundle. It requires searching for stuff in META-INF/services which does not work well at all in OSGi. ServiceMix will create a real usable bundle out of it with it's BundleActivator and stuff in it that would work. It will be part of their specs: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/
That said, if you DO want it to be a bundle, I'll work with gnodet to get a BundleActivator setup in it so it would work. That would save them from having to do any work. Your call. See http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/smx4/specs/trunk/jaxb- api-2.1/pom.xml for an example of how that would look. Dan > Are you happy with snapshots getting pushed or do you need a "M!" type > release with a vote and everything? > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jun 16, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Jarek, > > > > I don't think I'm going to have any more time to add javadocs or > > anything. > > Thus, it's current state is probably the best that will be there for > > a while. > > Could you go ahead and move it back to G and do whatever updates are > > needed > > for a "alpha" release? > > > > Major thanks! > > > > Dan > > > > On Mon June 15 2009 10:40:43 am Jarek Gawor wrote: > >> Dan, > >> > >> Let me know when you think you are done with it and I'll move it to > >> Geronimo. > >> > >> Thanks for working on this, btw. > >> > >> Jarek > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Kulp<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Fri June 12 2009 5:23:42 pm David Jencks wrote: > >>>> What would your thought be on moving it to the geronimo spec > >>>> project > >>>> once it isn't having daily changes? > >>> > >>> Actually, with Dims' help, we're now there. I ran the tool > >>> Harmony used > >>> to compare API's and we're now 100% compatible with the jaxws 2.2 > >>> api > >>> jar. Now, that is not the same as running the TCK (which we don't > >>> have > >>> yet), but definitely a promising sign. I think I want to spend a > >>> little time early next week adding some javadoc, but then it would > >>> be > >>> good to move it back to geronimo-specs and do an "alpha" release. > >>> (wouldn't call it a 1.0 release until we have a tck to test it). > >>> > >>> Dan > >>> > >>>> I'm planning to release the jaxb 2.1 spec jar soon for geronimo > >>>> 2.2. > >>>> > >>>> thanks > >>>> david jencks > >>>> > >>>> On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >>>>> On Fri June 12 2009 3:42:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >>>>>> Thanks Dan, we need it for axis2 as well. Looks like we need > >>>>>> 2.2 of > >>>>>> JAXB as > >>>>>> well. > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm slightly less concerned about JAXB for right now for three > >>>>> reasons: > >>>>> > >>>>> 1) It's available in the Sun maven repos already (and now > >>>>> central ;-) ) > >>>>> > >>>>> 2) We never have had a JAXB 2.1 version released yet. We've > >>>>> always > >>>>> used the > >>>>> Sun version anyway. > >>>>> > >>>>> 3) We don't have an Apache implementation of JAXB so we need the > >>>>> Sun > >>>>> implementation anyway. > >>>>> > >>>>> Yes, a JAXB 2.2 version would be nice, but not critical right now. > >>>>> JAX-WS > >>>>> 2.2 is slightly critical as there isn't a version deployed in > >>>>> maven > >>>>> that we > >>>>> can start using as a starting point. We need SOMETHING that we > >>>>> can > >>>>> use > >>>>> pretty much ASAP. > >>>>> > >>>>> Dan > >>>>> > >>>>>> -- dims > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 06/12/2009 03:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >>>>>>> Just to let everyone know, I've started working on creating a > >>>>>>> specs jar > >>>>>>> for jaxws 2.2 in the CXF sandbox: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec > >>>>>>>/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> All apache committers can commit there so if anyone wants to > >>>>>>> help > >>>>>>> out... > >>>>>>> ;-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Mostly just wanted to let folks know I've started it so > >>>>>>> someone else > >>>>>>> doesn't go off and start it as well. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Daniel Kulp > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog > > > > -- > > Daniel Kulp > > [email protected] > > http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
