If it's being called 1.0-EA because of JCP legal restrictions [1] in the
draft specs (like is the case with JPA2), then it can't be officially
released.
[1] This is an implementation of an early-draft specification developed
under the Java Community Process (JCP) and is made available for testing
and evaluation purposes only. The code is not compatible with any
specification of the JCP.
If the above [1] is not in the public spec draft, then we should use
1.0-M1 instead.
-Donald
Jarek Gawor wrote:
David J.,
I was thinking (one we're done with all the changes) to release it as
1.0-EA (with vote and everything).
Jarek
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote:
I bundlized it.
Are you happy with snapshots getting pushed or do you need a "M!" type release
with a vote and everything?
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 16, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Jarek,
I don't think I'm going to have any more time to add javadocs or anything.
Thus, it's current state is probably the best that will be there for a while.
Could you go ahead and move it back to G and do whatever updates are needed
for a "alpha" release?
Major thanks!
Dan
On Mon June 15 2009 10:40:43 am Jarek Gawor wrote:
Dan,
Let me know when you think you are done with it and I'll move it to
Geronimo.
Thanks for working on this, btw.
Jarek
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Kulp<[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri June 12 2009 5:23:42 pm David Jencks wrote:
What would your thought be on moving it to the geronimo spec project
once it isn't having daily changes?
Actually, with Dims' help, we're now there. I ran the tool Harmony used
to compare API's and we're now 100% compatible with the jaxws 2.2 api
jar. Now, that is not the same as running the TCK (which we don't have
yet), but definitely a promising sign. I think I want to spend a
little time early next week adding some javadoc, but then it would be
good to move it back to geronimo-specs and do an "alpha" release.
(wouldn't call it a 1.0 release until we have a tck to test it).
Dan
I'm planning to release the jaxb 2.1 spec jar soon for geronimo 2.2.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Fri June 12 2009 3:42:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Thanks Dan, we need it for axis2 as well. Looks like we need 2.2 of
JAXB as
well.
I'm slightly less concerned about JAXB for right now for three
reasons:
1) It's available in the Sun maven repos already (and now
central ;-) )
2) We never have had a JAXB 2.1 version released yet. We've always
used the
Sun version anyway.
3) We don't have an Apache implementation of JAXB so we need the Sun
implementation anyway.
Yes, a JAXB 2.2 version would be nice, but not critical right now.
JAX-WS
2.2 is slightly critical as there isn't a version deployed in maven
that we
can start using as a starting point. We need SOMETHING that we can
use
pretty much ASAP.
Dan
-- dims
On 06/12/2009 03:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
Just to let everyone know, I've started working on creating a
specs jar
for jaxws 2.2 in the CXF sandbox:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/
All apache committers can commit there so if anyone wants to help
out...
;-)
Mostly just wanted to let folks know I've started it so someone else
doesn't go off and start it as well.
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
--
Daniel Kulp
[email protected]
http://www.dankulp.com/blog
