David J., I was thinking (one we're done with all the changes) to release it as 1.0-EA (with vote and everything).
Jarek On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: > > I bundlized it. > > Are you happy with snapshots getting pushed or do you need a "M!" type > release with a vote and everything? > > thanks > david jencks > > On Jun 16, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> >> Jarek, >> >> I don't think I'm going to have any more time to add javadocs or anything. >> Thus, it's current state is probably the best that will be there for a while. >> Could you go ahead and move it back to G and do whatever updates are needed >> for a "alpha" release? >> >> Major thanks! >> >> Dan >> >> On Mon June 15 2009 10:40:43 am Jarek Gawor wrote: >>> >>> Dan, >>> >>> Let me know when you think you are done with it and I'll move it to >>> Geronimo. >>> >>> Thanks for working on this, btw. >>> >>> Jarek >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Kulp<[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri June 12 2009 5:23:42 pm David Jencks wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What would your thought be on moving it to the geronimo spec project >>>>> once it isn't having daily changes? >>>> >>>> Actually, with Dims' help, we're now there. I ran the tool Harmony used >>>> to compare API's and we're now 100% compatible with the jaxws 2.2 api >>>> jar. Now, that is not the same as running the TCK (which we don't have >>>> yet), but definitely a promising sign. I think I want to spend a >>>> little time early next week adding some javadoc, but then it would be >>>> good to move it back to geronimo-specs and do an "alpha" release. >>>> (wouldn't call it a 1.0 release until we have a tck to test it). >>>> >>>> Dan >>>> >>>>> I'm planning to release the jaxb 2.1 spec jar soon for geronimo 2.2. >>>>> >>>>> thanks >>>>> david jencks >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri June 12 2009 3:42:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Dan, we need it for axis2 as well. Looks like we need 2.2 of >>>>>>> JAXB as >>>>>>> well. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm slightly less concerned about JAXB for right now for three >>>>>> reasons: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) It's available in the Sun maven repos already (and now >>>>>> central ;-) ) >>>>>> >>>>>> 2) We never have had a JAXB 2.1 version released yet. We've always >>>>>> used the >>>>>> Sun version anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> 3) We don't have an Apache implementation of JAXB so we need the Sun >>>>>> implementation anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, a JAXB 2.2 version would be nice, but not critical right now. >>>>>> JAX-WS >>>>>> 2.2 is slightly critical as there isn't a version deployed in maven >>>>>> that we >>>>>> can start using as a starting point. We need SOMETHING that we can >>>>>> use >>>>>> pretty much ASAP. >>>>>> >>>>>> Dan >>>>>> >>>>>>> -- dims >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 06/12/2009 03:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just to let everyone know, I've started working on creating a >>>>>>>> specs jar >>>>>>>> for jaxws 2.2 in the CXF sandbox: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All apache committers can commit there so if anyone wants to help >>>>>>>> out... >>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Mostly just wanted to let folks know I've started it so someone else >>>>>>>> doesn't go off and start it as well. >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Daniel Kulp >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Daniel Kulp >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog >> >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> [email protected] >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
