On Tue June 16 2009 1:07:48 pm Jarek Gawor wrote: > David J., > > I was thinking (one we're done with all the changes) to release it as > 1.0-EA (with vote and everything).
Yea. 1.0-EA or 1.0-alpha1 or similar would be perfect. Dan > > Jarek > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:21 PM, David Jencks <[email protected]> wrote: > > I bundlized it. > > > > Are you happy with snapshots getting pushed or do you need a "M!" type > > release with a vote and everything? > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > On Jun 16, 2009, at 6:39 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> Jarek, > >> > >> I don't think I'm going to have any more time to add javadocs or > >> anything. Thus, it's current state is probably the best that will be > >> there for a while. Could you go ahead and move it back to G and do > >> whatever updates are needed for a "alpha" release? > >> > >> Major thanks! > >> > >> Dan > >> > >> On Mon June 15 2009 10:40:43 am Jarek Gawor wrote: > >>> Dan, > >>> > >>> Let me know when you think you are done with it and I'll move it to > >>> Geronimo. > >>> > >>> Thanks for working on this, btw. > >>> > >>> Jarek > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Daniel Kulp<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> On Fri June 12 2009 5:23:42 pm David Jencks wrote: > >>>>> What would your thought be on moving it to the geronimo spec project > >>>>> once it isn't having daily changes? > >>>> > >>>> Actually, with Dims' help, we're now there. I ran the tool Harmony > >>>> used to compare API's and we're now 100% compatible with the jaxws 2.2 > >>>> api jar. Now, that is not the same as running the TCK (which we don't > >>>> have yet), but definitely a promising sign. I think I want to spend > >>>> a little time early next week adding some javadoc, but then it would > >>>> be good to move it back to geronimo-specs and do an "alpha" release. > >>>> (wouldn't call it a 1.0 release until we have a tck to test it). > >>>> > >>>> Dan > >>>> > >>>>> I'm planning to release the jaxb 2.1 spec jar soon for geronimo 2.2. > >>>>> > >>>>> thanks > >>>>> david jencks > >>>>> > >>>>> On Jun 12, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >>>>>> On Fri June 12 2009 3:42:23 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >>>>>>> Thanks Dan, we need it for axis2 as well. Looks like we need 2.2 of > >>>>>>> JAXB as > >>>>>>> well. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm slightly less concerned about JAXB for right now for three > >>>>>> reasons: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1) It's available in the Sun maven repos already (and now > >>>>>> central ;-) ) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 2) We never have had a JAXB 2.1 version released yet. We've always > >>>>>> used the > >>>>>> Sun version anyway. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 3) We don't have an Apache implementation of JAXB so we need the Sun > >>>>>> implementation anyway. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes, a JAXB 2.2 version would be nice, but not critical right now. > >>>>>> JAX-WS > >>>>>> 2.2 is slightly critical as there isn't a version deployed in maven > >>>>>> that we > >>>>>> can start using as a starting point. We need SOMETHING that we can > >>>>>> use > >>>>>> pretty much ASAP. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Dan > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- dims > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 06/12/2009 03:35 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >>>>>>>> Just to let everyone know, I've started working on creating a > >>>>>>>> specs jar > >>>>>>>> for jaxws 2.2 in the CXF sandbox: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/sandbox/geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spe > >>>>>>>>c/ > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> All apache committers can commit there so if anyone wants to help > >>>>>>>> out... > >>>>>>>> ;-) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Mostly just wanted to let folks know I've started it so someone > >>>>>>>> else doesn't go off and start it as well. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Daniel Kulp > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog > >> > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog -- Daniel Kulp [email protected] http://www.dankulp.com/blog
