+1 Le dim. 19 juin 2022 à 16:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> a écrit :
> Hi, > > Activation, transaction and connector are used also in Aries, ActiveMQ, > Karaf. > > So, no problem for me as soon as we keep the "generic" aspect (not > TomEE too centric). > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 6:29 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to discussing moving > this code over to TomEE? > > > > - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/ > > - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-activation_2.0_spec/ > > - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec/ > > - > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/ > > > > These are on the critical path for TomEE, being updated in Jakarta EE > 10. We're not working on Jakarta EE 10 yet, but we'll hopefully be doing > that by early next year. > > > > It's a bit painful to send people over from the TomEE project to here > and submit patches against SVN repos. It would be great if we could have > them in git and under the TomEE PMC if possible. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -David > > > > > On Jun 6, 2022, at 1:59 AM, fpapon <fpa...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would like to start a thread to discuss about the future of the > Apache Geronimo Microprofile implementation: > > > > > > https://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/ > > > > > > As we can see, we don't have a lot of traction about the maintenance > of the implementation to be up-to-date with the Microprofile specification. > > > > > > The J2EE Geronimo server is no longer exist and at Apache, the active > EE server seems to be Apache TomEE. > > > > > > May be it could make more sense to move the Microprofile > implementation to the Apache TomEE umbrella. > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > -- > > > -- > > > François > > > > > > -- Jean-Louis
