> On Jun 14, 2022, at 10:09 PM, David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think each impl. needs to be in its own git repo, I’m not sure which > already are.
Agree. Currently connector and txmanager are in the same git repo. > I believe the tx manager is used in an OSGI spec impl in (I think) Aries. On > the other hand they might have copied the implementation. It might be > confusing if the governing project and/or package names change. I don’t know > if there are other uses, or how to find out. > > It might possibly be simpler, after we get each subproject into appropriate > git repos, to make people who want to work on these implementations geronimo > committers. I don't know if it helps the conversation, but we need a different version that's incompatible to what Aries and ActiveMQ uses. We would be developing and implementing jakarta.* implementations they couldn't use. For them to switch from javax to jakarta, they'd need to change all their dependencies anyway. Really the question being asked is does anyone mind if we develop separate Jakarta versions of the APIs on the TomEE side? It would be a little easier for us. -David >> On Jun 14, 2022, at 9:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> No blocker from me (minor note being some are already on git so don't start >> back from svn ;)) >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book >> >> >> Le mar. 14 juin 2022 à 18:29, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to discussing moving this >> code over to TomEE? >> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/ >> - >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-activation_2.0_spec/ >> - >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec/ >> - >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/ >> >> These are on the critical path for TomEE, being updated in Jakarta EE 10. >> We're not working on Jakarta EE 10 yet, but we'll hopefully be doing that by >> early next year. >> >> It's a bit painful to send people over from the TomEE project to here and >> submit patches against SVN repos. It would be great if we could have them >> in git and under the TomEE PMC if possible. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> -David >> >> > On Jun 6, 2022, at 1:59 AM, fpapon <fpa...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I would like to start a thread to discuss about the future of the Apache >> > Geronimo Microprofile implementation: >> > >> > https://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/ >> > >> > As we can see, we don't have a lot of traction about the maintenance of >> > the implementation to be up-to-date with the Microprofile specification. >> > >> > The J2EE Geronimo server is no longer exist and at Apache, the active EE >> > server seems to be Apache TomEE. >> > >> > May be it could make more sense to move the Microprofile implementation to >> > the Apache TomEE umbrella. >> > >> > WDYT? >> > >> > regards, >> > >> > -- >> > -- >> > François >> > >> >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
