If it helps: the package is not a big deal for javax -> jakarta concerned bundles but can be for the one already migrated. A note is that the OSGi compliance should probable be kept inside tomee project since several consumers are OSGi ones but nothing crazy or not already done @tomee AFAIK.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le jeu. 7 juil. 2022 à 10:19, Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > Hi all, > > to summarize the current discussion: > > From the discussion, it looks like, that there are no real objections / > blockers for a move? > > However, a move of the packages / project might confuse users and > automated tools (like dependency update check tooling). We would need > to communicate / announce it accordingly, but haven't discussed this > aspect much atm? > > It seems, that an open task is to complete the move from svn to git for > the repositories where it isn't already done. Guess, this should happen > first... > > Gruß > Richard > > > Am Dienstag, dem 14.06.2022 um 22:09 -0700 schrieb David Jencks: > > I think each impl. needs to be in its own git repo, I’m not sure > > which already are. > > > > I believe the tx manager is used in an OSGI spec impl in (I think) > > Aries. On the other hand they might have copied the implementation. > > It might be confusing if the governing project and/or package names > > change. I don’t know if there are other uses, or how to find out. > > > > It might possibly be simpler, after we get each subproject into > > appropriate git repos, to make people who want to work on these > > implementations geronimo committers. > > > > David Jencks > > > > > On Jun 14, 2022, at 9:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > No blocker from me (minor note being some are already on git so > > > don't start back from svn ;)) > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 14 juin 2022 à 18:29, David Blevins < > > > david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > Jumping off of this thread, is there any openness to discussing > > > > moving this code over to TomEE? > > > > > > > > - > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/trunk/ > > > > - > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-activation_2.0_spec/ > > > > - > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec/ > > > > - > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/ > > > > > > > > These are on the critical path for TomEE, being updated in > > > > Jakarta EE 10. We're not working on Jakarta EE 10 yet, but we'll > > > > hopefully be doing that by early next year. > > > > > > > > It's a bit painful to send people over from the TomEE project to > > > > here and submit patches against SVN repos. It would be great if > > > > we could have them in git and under the TomEE PMC if possible. > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > On Jun 6, 2022, at 1:59 AM, fpapon <fpa...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to start a thread to discuss about the future of > > > > the Apache Geronimo Microprofile implementation: > > > > > > > > > > https://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/ > > > > > > > > > > As we can see, we don't have a lot of traction about the > > > > maintenance of the implementation to be up-to-date with the > > > > Microprofile specification. > > > > > > > > > > The J2EE Geronimo server is no longer exist and at Apache, the > > > > active EE server seems to be Apache TomEE. > > > > > > > > > > May be it could make more sense to move the Microprofile > > > > implementation to the Apache TomEE umbrella. > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > -- > > > > > François > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
