+1 to go for HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC4 voting.

@Roman and @Ed, if possible, would you please elaborate more regarding the
review so that broader developers can do that as well? Thanks.

Best regards,
Ruilong Huo

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:

> Roman,
>
> If possible, I wouldn't mind observing your review.
>
> -=e
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All outstanding Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC3 issues have been
> > resolved.  We can go for RC4 as soon as possible.
> >
> > -=e
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Vineet Goel <vvin...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Seems like the pending issues are resolved, so we're good to go with RC4
> >> now.
> >>
> >> Ed - would u agree?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:23 AM Goden Yao <goden...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I want to check if the community thinks we're ready to spin up another
> >>> RC4
> >>> voting.
> >>> Let me know so I can prepare the binary.
> >>> -Goden
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:59 AM Goden Yao <goden...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Just to confirm based on Legal-79, ppport.h is an exception with your
> >>> PR,
> >>> > it looks we're good now.
> >>> > Thanks Ed.
> >>> > -Goden
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:52 AM Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> FYI: the two issues related to the Perl Artistic License have been
> >>> >> resolved
> >>> >> in both 2.0.0.0-incubating and master branches:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Remove ASF Category X incompatible JSON Perl Module (Artistic
> license)
> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1062
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Declare PL/Perl's ppport.h source file to be an Artistic License
> >>> >> exception.
> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1065
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 8:11 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> >>> ro...@shaposhnik.org>
> >>> >> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:47 AM, Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> > > I have been reviewing the licensing of ppport.h.  It is
> generated
> >>> >> header
> >>> >> > > file from Devel::PPPort - Perl/Pollution/Portability (
> >>> >> > > http://search.cpan.org/~wolfsage/Devel-PPPort-3.32/PPPort.pm).
> >>> The
> >>> >> file
> >>> >> > > came to us from the original PostgreSQL source code base.
> >>> >> Interestingly,
> >>> >> > > there is this note on the project page:
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > How to use ppport.h
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > Don't direct the users of your module to download Devel::PPPort.
> >>> They
> >>> >> are
> >>> >> > > most probably no XS writers. Also, don't make ppport.h optional.
> >>> >> Rather,
> >>> >> > > just take the most recent copy of ppport.h that you can find
> >>> (e.g. by
> >>> >> > > generating it with the latest Devel::PPPort release from CPAN),
> >>> copy
> >>> >> it
> >>> >> > > into your project, adjust your project to use it, and distribute
> >>> the
> >>> >> > header
> >>> >> > > along with your module.
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > Is it possible this file can be an exception under the following
> >>> jira:
> >>> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-79?
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > I also noticed the Apache HTTP Request Library (
> >>> >> > > http://httpd.apache.org/apreq) project also ships with it's own
> >>> >> ppport.h
> >>> >> > > file generated in a similar way (
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> https://github.com/apache/apreq/blob/trunk/glue/perl/xsbuild
> >>> er/ppport.h
> >>> >> > ).
> >>> >> > >
> >>> >> > > @Roman or @Justin, can you provide some guidance on how to
> proceed
> >>> >> with
> >>> >> > > this file?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > See my suggestion above. On top of that, the podling needs to
> decide
> >>> >> > whether
> >>> >> > bundling Artistic/Perl code into its code base is so important
> that
> >>> we
> >>> >> > need to
> >>> >> > spin ASF legal wheels in motion and ask for a formal
> classification
> >>> of
> >>> >> the
> >>> >> > Artistic/Perl license.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Thanks,
> >>> >> > Roman.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> *Ed Espino*
> >>> >> *esp...@apache.org <esp...@apache.org>*
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Ed Espino*
> >
> >
> >
> > *esp...@apache.org-- <esp...@apache.org> <esp...@apache.org>
> > <esp...@apache.org> <esp...@apache.org> <esp...@apache.org>
> > <esp...@apache.org>Ed Espino <esp...@apache.org>
> > <esp...@apache.org>esp...@apache.org <esp...@apache.org> *
> >
>

Reply via email to