FWIW, we are running 2.7.x in production and it's stable.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > we had not decided yet AFAIK. a big concern was the lack of > maintenance releases on more recent Hadoop versions and the perception > that 2.4 and 2.5 were the last big stable release lines. > > 2.6 and 2.7 have both gotten a few maintenance releases now, so maybe > this isn't a concern any more? > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> wrote: > > I thought we already decided to do that, no? > > > > Enis > > > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Looking at http://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html , 2.5.x hasn't got > new > >> release for almost two years. > >> > >> Seems fine to drop support for 2.4 and 2.5 > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> > This is the current hadoop version support matrix > >> > > >> > https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop > >> > > >> > 2016-10-19 9:40 GMT+08:00 Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org>: > >> > > >> > > To be specific, hadoop-2.4.x and hadoop-2.5.x. > >> > > > >> > > The latest releases for these two lines are about two years ago, so > I > >> > > think it is the time to drop the support of them when 2.0 out. Then > we > >> > > could drop some code in our hadoop-compat module as we may need to > add > >> > some > >> > > code for the incoming hadoop-3.0... > >> > > > >> > > Thanks. > >> > > > >> > > >> > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
