See HBASE-16887 2016-10-20 22:50 GMT+08:00 Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com>:
> Unfortunately, I think this means we'll need to update the hadoopcheck > versions to vary by branch. > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 6:21 PM, 张铎 <palomino...@gmail.com> wrote: > > OK, seems no objection. I will file a issue to modify the hadoop version > > support matrix. > > > > And I think we also need to change the hadoopcheck versions for our > > precommit check? > > > > Thanks all. > > > > 2016-10-20 1:14 GMT+08:00 Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>: > > > >> FWIW, we are running 2.7.x in production and it's stable. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> > we had not decided yet AFAIK. a big concern was the lack of > >> > maintenance releases on more recent Hadoop versions and the perception > >> > that 2.4 and 2.5 were the last big stable release lines. > >> > > >> > 2.6 and 2.7 have both gotten a few maintenance releases now, so maybe > >> > this isn't a concern any more? > >> > > >> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis....@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > I thought we already decided to do that, no? > >> > > > >> > > Enis > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Looking at http://hadoop.apache.org/releases.html , 2.5.x hasn't > got > >> > new > >> > >> release for almost two years. > >> > >> > >> > >> Seems fine to drop support for 2.4 and 2.5 > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > This is the current hadoop version support matrix > >> > >> > > >> > >> > https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop > >> > >> > > >> > >> > 2016-10-19 9:40 GMT+08:00 Duo Zhang <zhang...@apache.org>: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > To be specific, hadoop-2.4.x and hadoop-2.5.x. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > The latest releases for these two lines are about two years > ago, > >> so > >> > I > >> > >> > > think it is the time to drop the support of them when 2.0 out. > >> Then > >> > we > >> > >> > > could drop some code in our hadoop-compat module as we may > need to > >> > add > >> > >> > some > >> > >> > > code for the incoming hadoop-3.0... > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > Thanks. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> > >> - Andy > >> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > >> (via Tom White) > >> > > > > -- > busbey >