+1 on moving to 2.4. Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org> 于2021年10月11日周一 下午3:40写道：
> I have done some chaos testing as well as ingestion testing 3-4 times on > the recent 2.4 versions, each spanning the duration of around 8-10 hr. And > also tested rolling upgrade from 1.6 to 2.4 a couple of times after > applying the recent fixes on adding missing CFs in meta table as part of > the upgrade. (Upgrade requires upgrading all RS first before masters) > > Things seem to be running well so far, no significant concerns have been > identified with default configs so far. > > Andrew and I will keep testing this release line on different > infrastructure with different tooling, but for now, I have sufficient test > data to provide my +1 for moving the stable pointers to 2.4. And thank you > for starting this thread, Sean! > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 1:46 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi folks! > > > > I'd like us to move the stable pointer from 2.3.z releases to 2.4.6+ > > releases. > > > > The last time we talked about doing so[1] there was a desire to get > > some documentation together on what we as a community expect from the > > "stable" release line. We have an issue tracking those needs[2], but > > AFAICT we haven't had sufficient community interest to get criteria > > together over the last 6 months. > > > > The 2.3 release line started in July 2020 and there is active > > discussion about declaring it EOL[3]. 2.4 releases have been going > > since Dec 2020 and there is attestation that 2.4 has been as or more > > stable than 2.3 in a testing environment[4]. > > > > Personally, I view the "stable" pointer as simply a way to say "if you > > are new to our community we'd like you to use this release." I > > personally think 2.4.z currently meets that standard and we need not > > block updating on something more rigorous. > > > > What do folks think? > > > > -busbey > > > > [1]: > > "[DISCUSS] Updating the 'stable' pointer to 2.4.2" : > > https://s.apache.org/6cz3t > > > > [2]: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25690 > > > > [3]: > > "[DISCUSS] EOL 2.3" : https://s.apache.org/pgkge > > > > [4]: > > Message on thread "[DISCUSS] EOL 2.3" > > https://s.apache.org/ks7wk > > >
