I was thinking we can add these things to the upgrade section. https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade2.0.rolling.upgrades
Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> 于2021年10月11日周一 下午10:59写道： > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:24 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Could you please file an issue to add these to our ref guide? I think > these > > are all very important experiences for our end users. > > > > Question: Is the ref guide the place where we want to document what > community testing has been performed on any given release? What would such > a section look like? Who do we imagine will benefit from such information? > How will they find it? How will they volunteer new results? > > Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org> 于2021年10月11日周一 下午3:46写道： > > > > > Moreover, I have also tested rollback from 2.4 to 1.6 and after taking > > care > > > of some rsgroup ordering issues as part of the downgrade, we have seen > > > smooth downgrade as well (with the only exception that last RS that > stays > > > on 2.4 needs to be shutdown non-gracefully or killed, because of > > > HBASE-17931). > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 1:10 PM, Viraj Jasani <vjas...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > I have done some chaos testing as well as ingestion testing 3-4 times > > on > > > > the recent 2.4 versions, each spanning the duration of around 8-10 > hr. > > > And > > > > also tested rolling upgrade from 1.6 to 2.4 a couple of times after > > > > applying the recent fixes on adding missing CFs in meta table as part > > of > > > > the upgrade. (Upgrade requires upgrading all RS first before masters) > > > > > > > > Things seem to be running well so far, no significant concerns have > > been > > > > identified with default configs so far. > > > > > > > > Andrew and I will keep testing this release line on different > > > > infrastructure with different tooling, but for now, I have sufficient > > > test > > > > data to provide my +1 for moving the stable pointers to 2.4. And > thank > > > you > > > > for starting this thread, Sean! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 1:46 AM, Sean Busbey <bus...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Hi folks! > > > >> > > > >> I'd like us to move the stable pointer from 2.3.z releases to 2.4.6+ > > > >> releases. > > > >> > > > >> The last time we talked about doing so[1] there was a desire to get > > > >> some documentation together on what we as a community expect from > the > > > >> "stable" release line. We have an issue tracking those needs[2], but > > > >> AFAICT we haven't had sufficient community interest to get criteria > > > >> together over the last 6 months. > > > >> > > > >> The 2.3 release line started in July 2020 and there is active > > > >> discussion about declaring it EOL[3]. 2.4 releases have been going > > > >> since Dec 2020 and there is attestation that 2.4 has been as or more > > > >> stable than 2.3 in a testing environment[4]. > > > >> > > > >> Personally, I view the "stable" pointer as simply a way to say "if > you > > > >> are new to our community we'd like you to use this release." I > > > >> personally think 2.4.z currently meets that standard and we need not > > > >> block updating on something more rigorous. > > > >> > > > >> What do folks think? > > > >> > > > >> -busbey > > > >> > > > >> [1]: > > > >> "[DISCUSS] Updating the 'stable' pointer to 2.4.2" : > > > >> https://s.apache.org/6cz3t > > > >> > > > >> [2]: > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25690 > > > >> > > > >> [3]: > > > >> "[DISCUSS] EOL 2.3" : https://s.apache.org/pgkge > > > >> > > > >> [4]: > > > >> Message on thread "[DISCUSS] EOL 2.3" > > > >> https://s.apache.org/ks7wk > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
