I think we have reached an agreement here to move the stable pointer 2.4.x.
Since 2.4.7 has been released, let's move the stable pointer to 2.4.7. Will do this later today. Thanks all for helping! Viraj Jasani <[email protected]> 于2021年10月12日周二 下午2:59写道： > Sounds good. Created HBASE-26352 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-26352>, will get to it after > completing some additional testing. > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:47 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I was thinking we can add these things to the upgrade section. > > > > https://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade2.0.rolling.upgrades > > > > Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> 于2021年10月11日周一 下午10:59写道： > > > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 2:24 AM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Could you please file an issue to add these to our ref guide? I think > > > these > > > > are all very important experiences for our end users. > > > > > > > > > > Question: Is the ref guide the place where we want to document what > > > community testing has been performed on any given release? What would > > such > > > a section look like? Who do we imagine will benefit from such > > information? > > > How will they find it? How will they volunteer new results? > > > > > > Viraj Jasani <[email protected]> 于2021年10月11日周一 下午3:46写道： > > > > > > > > > Moreover, I have also tested rollback from 2.4 to 1.6 and after > > taking > > > > care > > > > > of some rsgroup ordering issues as part of the downgrade, we have > > seen > > > > > smooth downgrade as well (with the only exception that last RS that > > > stays > > > > > on 2.4 needs to be shutdown non-gracefully or killed, because of > > > > > HBASE-17931). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 1:10 PM, Viraj Jasani <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I have done some chaos testing as well as ingestion testing 3-4 > > times > > > > on > > > > > > the recent 2.4 versions, each spanning the duration of around > 8-10 > > > hr. > > > > > And > > > > > > also tested rolling upgrade from 1.6 to 2.4 a couple of times > after > > > > > > applying the recent fixes on adding missing CFs in meta table as > > part > > > > of > > > > > > the upgrade. (Upgrade requires upgrading all RS first before > > masters) > > > > > > > > > > > > Things seem to be running well so far, no significant concerns > have > > > > been > > > > > > identified with default configs so far. > > > > > > > > > > > > Andrew and I will keep testing this release line on different > > > > > > infrastructure with different tooling, but for now, I have > > sufficient > > > > > test > > > > > > data to provide my +1 for moving the stable pointers to 2.4. And > > > thank > > > > > you > > > > > > for starting this thread, Sean! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 1:46 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi folks! > > > > > >> > > > > > >> I'd like us to move the stable pointer from 2.3.z releases to > > 2.4.6+ > > > > > >> releases. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> The last time we talked about doing so[1] there was a desire to > > get > > > > > >> some documentation together on what we as a community expect > from > > > the > > > > > >> "stable" release line. We have an issue tracking those needs[2], > > but > > > > > >> AFAICT we haven't had sufficient community interest to get > > criteria > > > > > >> together over the last 6 months. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> The 2.3 release line started in July 2020 and there is active > > > > > >> discussion about declaring it EOL[3]. 2.4 releases have been > going > > > > > >> since Dec 2020 and there is attestation that 2.4 has been as or > > more > > > > > >> stable than 2.3 in a testing environment[4]. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Personally, I view the "stable" pointer as simply a way to say > "if > > > you > > > > > >> are new to our community we'd like you to use this release." I > > > > > >> personally think 2.4.z currently meets that standard and we need > > not > > > > > >> block updating on something more rigorous. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> What do folks think? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -busbey > > > > > >> > > > > > >> [1]: > > > > > >> "[DISCUSS] Updating the 'stable' pointer to 2.4.2" : > > > > > >> https://s.apache.org/6cz3t > > > > > >> > > > > > >> [2]: > > > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-25690 > > > > > >> > > > > > >> [3]: > > > > > >> "[DISCUSS] EOL 2.3" : https://s.apache.org/pgkge > > > > > >> > > > > > >> [4]: > > > > > >> Message on thread "[DISCUSS] EOL 2.3" > > > > > >> https://s.apache.org/ks7wk > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
