On Tue, 2018-02-06 at 09:55 +0000, sebb wrote: > On 4 February 2018 at 11:49, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> > wrote: > > On Sat, 2018-02-03 at 23:02 +0000, sebb wrote: > > > On 3 February 2018 at 10:32, Oleg Kalnichevski <ol...@apache.org> > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > Like, better tools tend to use markdown. > > > > > > But Maven is not a content generation tool; > > > > Why are we using it as a content generation tool I am wondering? > > We are not; we are using editors etc. > > Maven is used to generate the presentation of the content as a > website > or a PDF or whatever. >
You are confusing content generation with content authoring. ... > AFAICR I have done both, but not recently. > Would you be able to mention any particular contribution of a non- trivial feature or functionality that had also entailed adding a code sample to the project website or adding a new section to the tutorial? ... > > > and cannot generate sites consisting of multiple versions of > > the same artifact. > > AIUI the multiple sites issue is more about svnpubsub, though > No, it is not about svnpubsub at all. It is about unsuitability of Maven site plugin for our project web site. > > > No, Sebastian, all is peachy and Maven site plugin is just fine as > > long > > as you do not have to touch it. > > Well, it is working now, is it not? > Working, but badly, so that no one wants to touch it, including myself. ... > I *am* saying we need to preserve links. > Moving from Maven may make this harder, so that needs to be factored > in to the decision. So, we have made a full circle here: I am aware that we should preserve links, eat healthy, be polite, and stay away from those girls. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@hc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@hc.apache.org
