At 02:43 PM 11/23/2002, Jim Jagielski wrote: >My own POV is that a R-T-C on 2.0 will almost ensure a very slow >development environ on that effort. We haven't felt the need >to do so with 1.3, so, unless the idea is that: (1) no one will >be looking at 2.0 compared to 2.1 and therefore c-t-r is a noop >or (2) we don't want a heathly development environ on 2.0. Neither >option fills me with happy and warm thoughts :)
It's my understanding that 1.3 does operate on R-T-C. Correct me if I'm wrong (a pointer to a final determination would be nice.) Bill
