> I think that R-T-C is the most likely way we'll get good reviews of > code moved to the stable tree.
Jeff is speaking from his experience with 2.0 development and I would have to agree with him in this regard. However, I think it is possible to maintain CTR and ask committers to be more conservative in what they commit to the tree before reviewing it on the dev list first. That's how we ran the entire 1.3 development (I join about 1.3b1 time). By comparison, 2.0 (and recent 1.3) development has been sloppy. Bill
