Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 02:08 PM, Henning Brauer wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 03:44:48PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> FWIW I agree with Jeff here. I retracted the statement since JimJ, > >> Cliff and Aaron all seem to want to err on the side of C-T-R. > >> > >> So count this > >> > >> R-T-C: Jeff, Will > >> C-T-R: JimJ, Cliff, Aaron > >> > >> More voices are always welcome. > > > > I don't get your problem with R-T-C. we're doing so for all branches in > > OpenBSD. our stable branches have maintainers, so if someone fixes a > > bug he > > thinks should go to stable he sends it to the stable maintainer and he > > checks again before commiting. I do not see any developent slowdown > > due to > > R-T-C, but just a quality improvement. > > We don't have any concept of code ownership within httpd, and therefore > can't have official "maintainers" of portions of httpd.
substitute "anybody interested in looking over code for inclusion in the stable tree" for "stable maintainer" -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
