On Sep 11, 2007, at 4:04 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/11/2007 06:23 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 11, 2007, at 12:09 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
1. IMHO requires a minor bump.
Find a patch that covers all the points you raised below.
More comments?
Requires a major bump. Also destroys all those mystical
Curious again. Why a major bump? Because lb_score is being
converted from
a complete type to an incomplete type?
That is one reason. Another is that any module, including
mod_proxy, which needs to create the "old" lb_score needs
to implement ap_proxy_lb_worker_size(). If that function
doesn't exist, then even if they implement ap_proxy_lb_workers(),
the lb score slot will be 0 size...
I would say that if the code was adjusted so if
the function did not exist, and the worker_size
defaulted to 1024, then they would be no regressions
for 3rd party modules, which would remove the bump and
make it a viable 2.2 backport.
I'd +1 that.
