Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 09/11/2007 10:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> I would also suggest that we keep ap_proxy_lb_workers >> in proxy_util.c (as it currently is), since even >> though its not part of the API, other proxy module >> make have a need for it (and again, keeping the >> number of changes to a minimum). > > +1. That means also to keep it in mod_proxy.h. > But we shouldn't do the same mistake with ap_proxy_lb_worker_size(). > So keep it static in mod_proxy.c.
Ok I have committed the patch taking in account all the comments. Thanks Jean-Frederic > > Regards > > Rüdiger > >
