On 09/11/2007 10:51 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> 
> I would also suggest that we keep ap_proxy_lb_workers
> in proxy_util.c (as it currently is), since even
> though its not part of the API, other proxy module
> make have a need for it (and again, keeping the
> number of changes to a minimum).

+1. That means also to keep it in mod_proxy.h.
But we shouldn't do the same mistake with ap_proxy_lb_worker_size().
So keep it static in mod_proxy.c.

Regards

Rüdiger

Reply via email to