Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 12/05/2006 07:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> On Dec 5, 2006, at 7:23 AM, Joe Orton wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 06:39:30AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> >>>> A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but >>>> I don't see anything that looks like a veto. >>>> >>>> (http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/% >>>> 3c44d03f79.2030...@nohn.net%3e) >>>> >>>> A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved, >>>> but implementation of the original feature died. Before Sebastian >>>> Nohn's patch is revised to fit in with the subsequent changes, I'd >>>> like to confirm that nobody has a strong (veto) objection to the >>>> feature, and that those in favor clearly out number those against. >>> >>> +1. Should be documented as "a bad idea" as Joshua notes in that >>> thread. >>> >> +1 (with that condition) > > +1 provided the condition above is true.
Jim, when you committed ServerTokens Set, you did not address this concern expressed by a significant number of project members. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml also has an error in the <syntax>, it doesn't appear that you updated it. Jeff even offered a draft :)
--- Begin Message ---\ ¢éí)ìqÊ.ÞQzÛ«ö ׯën®~yë®Ýzùb²Û
--- End Message ---
