Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > > My apologies for not responding earlier, but I was busy moving from > Munich to London last week ...
Understandable, congratulations on what I hope was a successful move, thanks for responding today. > As far as I remember, Mads Toftum also voted with a -1. Yes; although Mads is neither a committer nor PMC member, there have been several other votes from the peanut gallery for and against, some tepid and some strong opinions. I was trying to distill the list to binding votes to reach a conclusion. > My -1 hasn't changed as I still feel very strongly about this for reasons > already discussed back in 2006 (and once in 2004 or 2005 when the > same discussion came up). Thank you for clarifying. > Given two -1s and many people voting -0 I'm wondering why we are still > discussing this topic? Ask Jim? Only one binding -1, yours still, and a majority (as you saw in the summary) voting +1 for the patch. Many of those individuals are active in triaging issues.a.o, users@ etc, and I see their rational. In fact, it refined my objection to be nominally +0.5 for the 'Off' behavior, while strongly -1.0 for any 'Set' behavior that represents Apache httpd as anything other than Apache httpd, which was also modified a couple weeks ago. > P.S.: I'm not sure what you mean with "hasn't responded in 21 months"? > I voted in 2006 on this topic and then you picked up this thread > last week? There were a few more days of activity you ignored back then, including posts to you from Jeff and Jim. Thanks for straighting us out :)
