-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Guenter, please confirm if you are casting a veto, or in light of > this earlier discussion and rationale, you are just expressing your > standing distaste for the patch (which is -0)? For the record, I also agree with Lars' and Guenter's rationale, and also vote -0
Issac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqnQmgACgkQ7bEFiW+VIthV3ACfSbQzayQsCrYNEOQJqCMS6E3z 2igAoJE/8bUyjhJAiVor4M7ArtLXcqoS =nLpa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----