Jim Jagielski wrote: > Lars Eilebrecht wrote: >> According to Jeff: >> >>> A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but >>> I don't see anything that looks like a veto. >> I voted -1 at that time which is a veto. >> >> My opinion hasn't changed and I still think that it is a very >> stupid idea to add a "feature" that allows our users to do >> something which is stupid and absurd. >> >> *shrug* but as everyone seems to think that this is a good idea, >> feel free to ignore my veto. > > A Veto is a Veto. If you feel strongly enough about it, then > it cannot be, and should not be, ignored.
Lars, yours is the last veto standing for ServerTokens Off. What say you? (Your veto would appear to imply a veto of any ServerTokens Set syntax). Bill
